Comments Thread For: Canelo-Kirkland Possible For September 15, Says Reynoso

[Snake...]

You seem to use too many triangle theories. Kirkland-Canelo is a 50-50 fight, maybe slightly 55-45 to Alvarez. Kirkland is a legit Top SWW with wins over Julio and Angulo. And despite having a tear in his shoulder and getting held 120 times against Molina, he still won 3 of 10 rounds, ahd had Molina hurt in the 10th.

It's a good fight. I hope it happens. We'd learn a lot more about Canelo if it does.

are you ******ed? I said Cintron is a better boxer who did Better against Molina then Kirkland did and i can't see Ishida beating cintron

[GodInFleshSuit]

are you ******ed? I said Cintron is a better boxer who did Better against Molina then Kirkland did and i can't see Ishida beating cintron

MEANING: Triangle Theory

[4Corners]

are you ******ed? I said Cintron is a better boxer who did Better against Molina then Kirkland did and i can't see Ishida beating cintron

So your triangle theory is that because Cintron did better against Molina, and because you can't see Ishia beating Cintron, that Kirkland would lose to Cintro hands down. You just can't compare things like that, because styles make fights.

It just seems like you use a lot of triangle theories, even on other threads, that's. Don't know why you started with the "******ed" word. That's just immature s**t if you ask me, pointless.

[Snake...]

MEANING: Triangle Theory

why? cuz i see how 2 boxers do against common foes and judge who's the better fighter?

[4Corners]

why? cuz i see how 2 boxers do against common foes and judge who's the better fighter?

Because it seemed like you were implying that because Molina did better against Cintron, and Kirkland struggled with Molina, and that you think Cintron easily beats Ishida (who Kirkland lost to), that you automatically think Kirkland loses to Cintron.

So if you weren't doing that, then there was really no substance to your post or any point of your post. That's all.

[Snake...]

So your triangle theory is that because Cintron did better against Molina, and because you can't see Ishia beating Cintron, that Kirkland would lose to Cintro hands down. You just can't compare things like that, because styles make fights.

It just seems like you use a lot of triangle theories, even on other threads, that's. Don't know why you started with the "******ed" word. That's just immature s**t if you ask me, pointless.

Dude STFU you on hear making EXCUSES for Kirkland's bum ass Performance's against Ishida and Molina at the SAME TIME overplaying his Performance's wins against Angulo and love child

and LOL at this fight being 50-50

[4Corners]

Dude STFU you on hear making EXCUSES for Kirkland's bum ass Performance's against Ishida and Molina at the SAME TIME overplaying his Performance's wins against Angulo and love child

and LOL at this fight being 50-50

Why are you such an internet warrior???

You can always tell who's been watching the sport for awhile and who hasn't. Usually the guys saying "bum", "duck", "cherry pick", right and left, are the guys who haven't. There's exceptions to every rule, but still.

Kirkland is still a Top SWW, would be the best fight Canelo has fought so far. The only other Top 10 SWW he's fought was Ryan Rhodes, who was a solid fight but not really good or anything.

I'd favor Alvarez slightly maybe 55-45, but he still has almost as many defensive problems as Kirkland does, who basically just comes forward and throws punches in bunches. We know Kirkland can get knocked down, but he's also proven he can get up and keep going, whup someone's ass, like he did against Angulo. We haven't seem Canelo's chin tested that much at all, and Kirkland would do that.

It's a good fight. If Alvarez is serious about a Floyd fight at some point, he needs to take fights like this.

Fight Kirkland in September, than a Top SWW again in December/January like Vanes/Molina, and than fight Cotto in May/June. If he were to do that, he'd easly earn himself a Floyd fight.

[Snake...]

Why are you such an internet warrior???

You can always tell who's been watching the sport for awhile and who hasn't. Usually the guys saying "bum", "duck", "cherry pick", right and left, are the guys who haven't. There's exceptions to every rule, but still.

Kirkland is still a Top SWW, would be the best fight Canelo has fought so far. The only other Top 10 SWW he's fought was Ryan Rhodes, who was a solid fight but not really good or anything.

I'd favor Alvarez slightly maybe 55-45, but he still has almost as many defensive problems as Kirkland does, who basically just comes forward and throws punches in bunches. We know Kirkland can get knocked down, but he's also proven he can get up and keep going, whup someone's ass, like he did against Angulo. We haven't seem Canelo's chin tested that much at all, and Kirkland would do that.

It's a good fight.

Cintron was top 5 when Canelo fought him..........and how exactly is Kirkland going to test his chin? did test Molina's, or Ishida's? and only reason he beat angulo was cuz angulo GASSED after 1 round and even then it took him 6 rounds to get the TKO

[Snake...]

i really hope Lara or Molina get the shot

[4Corners]

Cintron was top 5 when Canelo fought him..........and how exactly is Kirkland going to test his chin? did test Molina's, or Ishida's? and only reason he beat angulo was cuz angulo GASSED after 1 round and even then it took him 6 rounds to get the TKO

Naw, he wasn't even in the Top 10 after he lost to Molina, he wasn't. You obviously don't keep up on monthy RING rankings at all.

Kirkland would test his chin, because Alvarez isn't going to pull a Molina and hold 120 times, it;s going to be toe-to-toe, and Kirkland would connect with something. Kirkland is easy to hit, Alvarez is as well.

Angulo is a tough fighter, took Kirkland's shots well.

Bottom line....out of the two (Kirkland and Alvarez), Kirkland has the best win over Angulo.

When Canelo beat Cintron, it didn't mean a thing at all. He had a solid win over Rhodes, that's it.

Kirkland-Alvarez is a good fight.