Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mayweather Sr. on Floyd-Cotto, Retirement, Merchant Fix

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
    Dont you see how contradictory this sounds? Ok so even though Pac beats everyone better than Floyd it dont mean Pac beats Floyd, ok if that makes you happy. So even though Pac beats everyone better than Floyd it dont stop about people boasting Floyd did well against JMM does it? Even though they have nothing to boast about as Pac beats people better than FLoyd on the whole.
    If Pac beating people better than Floyd dont prove Pac would beat FLoyd, why dont Floyd prove that theory wrong by fighting Pac? Thats what hes got to do to prove that Pac beating people easier dont mean he will beat FLoyd.
    If that logic were true then FLOYD should have got beat bad by Corrles considering Corrales KOd Castillo the man many say beat FLOYD, but instead he got dropped five times and TKOd. Another example Jermaine Taylor beat Hopkins twice and turned around and got KOd by Pavlik so if your logic was true that Pavlik should have beat Hopkins but we all know Pavlik got his a$$ whipped. So you cant say because one guys beats a guy better that means he can beat the other guy.

    It goes both ways FLOYD gave his side and PAC gave his side. Unless you were there how do you know who's telling the truth. I don't care about PAC saying he will take the test, I want you to take the test. He could do it with BRADLEY to show he's serious about taking the test, but once again he wont. I mean everybody FLOYD fights takes it why wont MANNY?

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by TBOGGS78 View Post
      All these fighters yall keep naming for FLOYD to fight MANNY can fight as well I mean PAC and FLOYD are both 147lb fighters right? So if FLOYD can move up and challenge a young fighter like Alvarez then why can't MANNY. If you want FLOYD to move up and fight MARTINEZ why can't PAC. If you want FLOYD to fight KHAN why can't PAC. FLOYD could beat all those people and most would still find something to say about it. PAC is a 147lb Champ then why is he fighting Malignaggi sorry I meant Bradley I got them confused becuase they both hit with like theyre wearing pillows and pose no threat to PAC.
      Pac has fought 9 times since FLoyid retired and Floyd fought 3 times in 5 years. Do the maths, Pac does fight.

      People have something to say about Floyd, cos he dont fight. Dont try making out Bradley is not a dangerous fight for Pac now, as you would be the only one. Bradley is unbeaten so dont worry about how hard he hits. Probably hits harder than Floyd or a toss up at least.

      Pacs already beat big boy margarito who beat Sergio. So let floyd fight Sergio for now. Floyds got catching up to do, with his only 3 fights in 5 years or so. The least he can do is beat the man who lost to margarito.

      Comment


      • #33
        floyd sr shouldn't feel bad...floyd apologizing to merchant is just a marketing strategy (just like what some floyd fans used to say)

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
          Dont you see how contradictory this sounds? Ok so even though Pac beats everyone better than Floyd it dont mean Pac beats Floyd, ok if that makes you happy. So even though Pac beats everyone better than Floyd it dont stop about people boasting Floyd did well against JMM does it? Even though they have nothing to boast about as Pac beats people better than FLoyd on the whole.
          If Pac beating people better than Floyd dont prove Pac would beat FLoyd, why dont Floyd prove that theory wrong by fighting Pac? Thats what hes got to do to prove that Pac beating people easier dont mean he will beat FLoyd.
          If PAC would have beat De La Hoya and Cotto at 154 and not 145 that might be an arguement. Or if he didnt make Margarito fight at 150 or he didnt turned down a rematch with Cotto at 154, rematch with Marquez at 147, or Mayweather and turn around and fight a 140lb Bradley.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by TBOGGS78 View Post
            If that logic were true then FLOYD should have got beat bad by Corrles considering Corrales KOd Castillo the man many say beat FLOYD, but instead he got dropped five times and TKOd. Another example Jermaine Taylor beat Hopkins twice and turned around and got KOd by Pavlik so if your logic was true that Pavlik should have beat Hopkins but we all know Pavlik got his a$$ whipped. So you cant say because one guys beats a guy better that means he can beat the other guy.

            It goes both ways FLOYD gave his side and PAC gave his side. Unless you were there how do you know who's telling the truth. I don't care about PAC saying he will take the test, I want you to take the test. He could do it with BRADLEY to show he's serious about taking the test, but once again he wont. I mean everybody FLOYD fights takes it why wont MANNY?
            So long as you dont act like a floyd fanboy and say Floyd dont need Pac as he beat JMM, and dont encourage Floyds lacksadical behavior, we havent got a problem have we?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by TBOGGS78 View Post
              If PAC would have beat De La Hoya and Cotto at 154 and not 145 that might be an arguement. Or if he didnt make Margarito fight at 150 or he didnt turned down a rematch with Cotto at 154, rematch with Marquez at 147, or Mayweather and turn around and fight a 140lb Bradley.
              Are you just trolling now? You want pac to step up 3 divisions has it ever been done in the history of boxing?
              Pac dont need to rematch Cotto, floyd doesnt ever rematch unless he loses.

              So i dont know what your getting at now, changing the subject althogether. I thought your argument was Pac beating everyone better than FLoyd dont mean hed beat Floyd.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                Pac has fought 9 times since FLoyid retired and Floyd fought 3 times in 5 years. Do the maths, Pac does fight.

                People have something to say about Floyd, cos he dont fight. Dont try making out Bradley is not a dangerous fight for Pac now, as you would be the only one. Bradley is unbeaten so dont worry about how hard he hits. Probably hits harder than Floyd or a toss up at least.

                Pacs already beat big boy margarito who beat Sergio. So let floyd fight Sergio for now. Floyds got catching up to do, with his only 3 fights in 5 years or so. The least he can do is beat the man who lost to margarito.
                My post didnt say anything about how frequent either of them fight, I simply said these names yall keep throwing at FLOYD PAC can fight as well. You absolutely right PAC did beat Margarito at 154 the same man that beat Sergio so explain why he turned down Sergio's offer to fight even when Sergio said he would come down to 150, so why does Mayweather have to fight him. Bradley is not dangerous fight for PAC at 147, I dont care what anyone else thinks that's my opionion.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                  Are you just trolling now? You want pac to step up 3 divisions has it ever been done in the history of boxing?
                  Pac dont need to rematch Cotto, floyd doesnt ever rematch unless he loses.

                  So i dont know what your getting at now, changing the subject althogether. I thought your argument was Pac beating everyone better than FLoyd dont mean hed beat Floyd.
                  Are you reading my post. PAC did fight Maragrito at 154 right? So I guessed you answered your own question about him moving up three weight classes. He gave the only man a rematch that gave him a close fight Castillo nd he did it with five months, who else did he need to fight twice?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                    Are you just trolling now? You want pac to step up 3 divisions has it ever been done in the history of boxing?
                    Pac dont need to rematch Cotto, floyd doesnt ever rematch unless he loses.

                    So i dont know what your getting at now, changing the subject althogether. I thought your argument was Pac beating everyone better than FLoyd dont mean hed beat Floyd.
                    We were talking about PAC beating fighters worse then FLOYD and I replied that might be an arguement if PAC would have fought them at the same weight FLOYD did

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                      So long as you dont act like a floyd fanboy and say Floyd dont need Pac as he beat JMM, and dont encourage Floyds lacksadical behavior, we havent got a problem have we?
                      You lost me with this post

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP