JMM 54-4-1 not 54-6-1

[Rip Chudd]

Was looking at Juan Manuel Marquez' career and he's listed as 54-6-1. This can't be true. Mayweather said Cotto is an undefeated fighter in his eyes, one because Margs cheated, two because Pacquiao fought Cotto at a catchweight.

So with this logic, Marquez can scratch two losses off his record cause he fought Floyd and Pacquiao at a catchweight of 144. Another win for the Mexican fans!! Viva Mexico!!!! I know Maniac310 agrees!!

[Snake...]

Was looking at Juan Manuel Marquez' career and he's listed as 54-6-1. This can't be true. Mayweather said Cotto is an undefeated fighter in his eyes, one because Margs cheated, two because Pacquiao fought Cotto at a catchweight.

So with this logic, Marquez can scratch two losses off his record cause he fought Floyd and Pacquiao at a catchweight of 144. Another win for the Mexican fans!! Viva Mexico!!!! I know Maniac310 agrees!!

and those 4 losses were robberies! he should be unbeaten

[tranquilo]

Figure of speech combined with wishful thinking.

Useless thread.

[DeadLikeMe]

inb4 the same posters argue the two lbs meant nothing to Cotto but act like two lbs are the reason Floyd embarrassed JMM while JMM beat Pac a second time.

[Hougigo]

Therefore... JMM is better than Floyd!
54-0-1 Baby!
50+ have tried, 5 have cheated and everyone else failed.
LONG LIVE JMM!

[Zano-24]

I personally believe Marquez was robbed twice vs Manny. So I would take away 2 losses from his record.

[PACnPBFsuck]

[Alx.]

[Rip Chudd]

[SplitSecond]

i've seen plenty of people say marquez lost to barrera, so take a win away while your at it