Tweet
Does Froch, a man who has gone out and fought the best of the best in his division in their primes albeit picking up a couple of losses along the way, do enough if he beats Bute to better Calzaghe's resume?
Or does Calzaghe who was more cautious throughout his career and retired with his '0' in tact, albeit by facing the biggest names on his resume when they were past their primes, still have a better resume than Froch?
Also let's not forget that Froch was practically on his knees begging Calzaghe for a fight for many years but it never happened. Now im not gonna say Calzaghe ducked him as that would not be true, unfortunately at that time Froch was a nobody and not worth Calzaghe fighting.
Also i know Froch has lost to a man who Calzaghe beat, but im not asking who is the better boxer between Froch and Calzaghe, or who would have won if they fought. Im asking who has the better resume out of the two.
Or does Calzaghe who was more cautious throughout his career and retired with his '0' in tact, albeit by facing the biggest names on his resume when they were past their primes, still have a better resume than Froch?
Also let's not forget that Froch was practically on his knees begging Calzaghe for a fight for many years but it never happened. Now im not gonna say Calzaghe ducked him as that would not be true, unfortunately at that time Froch was a nobody and not worth Calzaghe fighting.
Also i know Froch has lost to a man who Calzaghe beat, but im not asking who is the better boxer between Froch and Calzaghe, or who would have won if they fought. Im asking who has the better resume out of the two.
Comment