Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Anyone else worried that the judges will rip Hopkins off again?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    hmm

    Man, you should stop with the name calling.

    All the experts had Hopkins winning..

    Taylor didn't really do **** in the early rounds to clearly win anything either, Taylor hardly landed any clean punches..

    Hey, lets make our avatar/signature bet instead of a month, we'll change it to the day pacquiao-morales fight..

    That means we get free January 21st...
    Just because they write for a magazine doesn't make them any better than the hardcore fans on this site who have been scoring fights for years as well. Also, you did notice that two of the most respected guys in boxing, particularly Al Bernstein, scored it for Taylor, right? And again, anyone who scored it 117-111 for Hopkins in such a close fight is clearly a biased fool. Again, if anyone says this fight is a ROBBERY then they deserve to be called names. They brought it on themselves.

    You can't give Hops the early rounds when he ran. There was one man pursuing and fighting and landing a little bit, and that was Taylor. Hops won his rounds clearly, but that doesn't mean he won MORE rounds. It's an especially ridiculous claim that Hopkins won so many more rounds than Taylor that it should be called a "robbery". People who say that are just Hopkins fans or haven't been watching boxing very long.

    Yeah, we can change the bet. Are we betting on Pac-EM too?

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by SturmRules
      u taylor fans are pathetic, ok a judge had it 116-112 hopkins, go head take 1 or 2 rounds away from that and give it to taylor, hmm that would make it a 114-114 so if u do that hopkins gets that 12th round that idiot scored for taylor hmm that would make it 114-114 as well, taylor did not beat hopkins and drew with him at best, i had 115-113 hopkins, but there is no fesible way u taylor addicts can fathom any score for taylor, shut up your boy is gonna get KO'd

      WHICH mf rds? Did you see that fight? You tell me you saw him win the majority of the rounds and I'll stfu ...


      ... and brand you a goddamn liar as well as add you to my tard list. Man ... I can't believe you're ****in serious and I PULLED FOR HOPKINS IN THAT FIGHT!!

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Super_Lightweight
        Just because they write for a magazine doesn't make them any better than the hardcore fans on this site who have been scoring fights for years as well. Also, you did notice that two of the most respected guys in boxing, particularly Al Bernstein, scored it for Taylor, right? And again, anyone who scored it 117-111 for Hopkins in such a close fight is clearly a biased fool. Again, if anyone says this fight is a ROBBERY then they deserve to be called names. They brought it on themselves.

        You can't give Hops the early rounds when he ran. There was one man pursuing and fighting and landing a little bit, and that was Taylor. Hops won his rounds clearly, but that doesn't mean he won MORE rounds. It's an especially ridiculous claim that Hopkins won so many more rounds than Taylor that it should be called a "robbery". People who say that are just Hopkins fans or haven't been watching boxing very long.

        Yeah, we can change the bet. Are we betting on Pac-EM too?
        No, we are not betting on Pac-EM..

        So if I win, I get control of your av/sig till the night pac-EM fight, and if you win u get control of my av/sig till then..

        Just to let you know, I disagree with lots of the things you just said as do many other people..

        2 of the most respected people?
        Al Bernstein? Yes.
        Larry Merchant? Hell no, everyone hates that biased drunk ****.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by blockhead
          i hope he doesnt get robbed again. and yes i am worried about it. that decision last time was a ****ing joke. bhop won that fight easily.
          easily? I don't think you can call it easily won in your favor when you lose 7 of the first 9 rounds, but hey, whatever helps you sleep at night

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by elveiel
            Taylor beat Hopkins, i dont know what fight some people were watching.
            Agreed! The most Nard can claim is that it COULD have been a draw..no clear victory for him by any means

            Comment


            • #56
              If Hopkins loses most of the early rounds again, he can't win a decision no matter how great he looks in round 12 LOL.

              Comment


              • #57
                im a big hopkins fan, but people really need to stop saying he got robbed, he didnt start lettin his hands go until the last 3 or 4 rounds! it was a close fight but he was in no way robbed.
                i really think that it wont even go to the scorecards this time, im predicting hopkins by 11th round ko/tko

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by kallsop
                  If Hopkins loses most of the early rounds again, he can't win a decision no matter how great he looks in round 12 LOL.
                  Exactly! Basic math and the 10 pt. must system rules it out, thats why we have it.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Hopkins needs to be impressive tonight. If he can have a great showing tonight and beat Taylor, thats shows what kind of fighter B hop is.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      I'm getting sick and tired of these Nard haters!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP