Rematch clause?

[Weebler I]

I remember Floyd once talking about beating someone decisively the first time, so that there's no need for a rematch. If Floyd is at 100% and Cotto beats him legitimately, idk if we will see a rematch, cuz it means Cotto's the better fighter. Floyd will most likely want to avenge the fight, and Cotto would oblige because of all the money on the line, but I think deep down, Floyd would know that he has no right to ask for one.

If Castillo was given the decision in 2002 we would still have saw a rematch.

Also, look at the difference between those two Castillo fights*. If Mayweather does lose, don't bet against him working Cotto out in a rematch.

* I don't buy the sore hand b/s

[kiaba360]

If Castillo was given the decision in 2002 we would still have saw a rematch.

Also, look at the difference between those two Castillo fights*. If Mayweather does lose, don't bet against him working Cotto out in a rematch.

* I don't buy the sore hand b/s

Floyd was supposedly injured in the first Castillo fight, so therefore he wasn't at 100%, hence why he wanted the rematch.

[Light_Speed]

Image if he lost then had to go to jail for 60 days.

The filipino government would declare a national holiday.

[Larry the boss]

The filipino government would declare a national holiday.

cotto is a pinoy now?

[Light_Speed]

cotto is a pinoy now?

Floyd losing to anyone would make them happy.

[Dr. Ill]

Floyd losing to anyone would make them happy.

floyd losing to anyone would make america happy.