Tell me what's wrong with this......
Collapse
-
That guy is a moron. First he says only from 1988-2012, but then includes Holmes??? If he's talking about what guys like Holmes, Duran did prior to 1988, fine. But then to leave out Leonard and Hagler??? No one should report anything that clown says again.Comment
-
U mad son?http://sports.yahoo.com/news/boxing-...his-peers.html
No Sugar Ray Leonard???? He included Hearns, Holmes, and no Sugar Ray Leonard???? Get the f**k outta here.
Meh
right or wrong, it's just an opinion.Comment
-
One of the caveats of my list is that a fighter has to have fought at least 10 times over that period to be considered. Otherwise, what do you do with a great fighter like Michael Spinks, who fought once in 1988, was knocked out in 91 seconds by Mike Tyson, and retired?
If a fighter fought more than 10 times in the 1988-2012 span, I'll consider his whole career when I rank him.Comment
-
Still, so because Larry Holmes fought years and years past his prime, he's considered??? That's just ludicrous.One of the caveats of my list is that a fighter has to have fought at least 10 times over that period to be considered. Otherwise, what do you do with a great fighter like Michael Spinks, who fought once in 1988, was knocked out in 91 seconds by Mike Tyson, and retired?
If a fighter fought more than 10 times in the 1988-2012 span, I'll consider his whole career when I rank him.Comment
-
Yeah I saw that and just didn't even give it any thought. Pure crap.http://sports.yahoo.com/news/boxing-...his-peers.html
No Sugar Ray Leonard???? He included Hearns, Holmes, and no Sugar Ray Leonard???? Get the f**k outta here.Comment
-
Comment
-
Wasn't calling you a dumba$$, just the writer. And I'm by no means a kid, I probably have a few on you. I only put $$ because I'm not going to cuss on here.
I didn't say anything about you.....Comment
Comment