Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley: I Honestly Feel Pacquiao is an Easy Fight!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Antagonist View Post
    I'm all for Bradley being a tough fight for Pacman, but I would severely advise you not to put money on it. You have to remember this is a Top Rank fight and Bob Arum has been convicted of bribing officials/judges in the past. He's banned from promoting fights in AZ.
    I know, that's what I'm worried about. Maybe not for this fight but for future fights, I'd like to put some money down

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by mathed View Post
      I am just worried about the robbery on the cards. Pac seems to look unimpressive against movement and Bradley will have lots of it.....I just got a feeling stuff is lined up right for Tim. I can't help but feel that Pac, Roach and the rest of those guys think Bradley is a pushover who is going to walk up to Pac and throw punches.

      Bringing in Providnikov is a prime example of this. That guy is like a tank who is going to walk forward and attack...little to no movement, slow, and not a boxer at all (more like a brawler). If that is how they think Tim is going to fight, they are going to be in for a shock.

      I do want to start betting on fights though....I was looking at that 5 dimes website but I'm in the states and don't really know how all the online stuff works....I know the Feds shut down Bodog
      Bradley's 4/1 to win with paddypower in UK, same odds as a Cotto win v Mayweather.

      Pacquiao does appear to struggle with movement if the Mosley fight is anything to go by but it's worth remembering he still easily out-pointed him.

      I just think sooner or later the two fighters are going to get caught in a toe-to-toe exchange and that's where it will probably get ugly for Tim, just as it did for Cotto who was winning the opening rounds v Pac.

      We'll see though.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by mathed View Post
        I am just worried about the robbery on the cards. Pac seems to look unimpressive against movement and Bradley will have lots of it.....I just got a feeling stuff is lined up right for Tim. I can't help but feel that Pac, Roach and the rest of those guys think Bradley is a pushover who is going to walk up to Pac and throw punches.
        I do pray that they can't actually be ****** enough to leave hints out there as to how they approach this fight. IIRC Pac hasn't or just recently started sparring. It would just be ****** to fathom that someone would give hints as to how to beat them.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Biolink View Post
          I do pray that they can't actually be ****** enough to leave hints out there as to how they approach this fight. IIRC Pac hasn't or just recently started sparring. It would just be ****** to fathom that someone would give hints as to how to beat them.
          Roach has been quoted as saying that Bradley is a com-forward fighter and that meshes well with Pac's style. Then they bring in Providnikov as a key sparring partner.

          I just can't wait for this fight.....I like both fighters and just hope that Bradley does what I think he will so that the dude can finally get some credit.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by mathed View Post
            Roach has been quoted as saying that Bradley is a com-forward fighter and that meshes well with Pac's style. Then they bring in Providnikov as a key sparring partner.

            I just can't wait for this fight.....I like both fighters and just hope that Bradley does what I think he will so that the dude can finally get some credit.
            Just saying that if you are gonna mislead someone, now would be the time for them.

            This is gonna be one hell of a matchup though. A real good test for the "Pacquiao has trouble with movers" theory.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by The Weebler II View Post
              Bradley's 4/1 to win with paddypower in UK, same odds as a Cotto win v Mayweather.

              Pacquiao does appear to struggle with movement if the Mosley fight is anything to go by but it's worth remembering he still easily out-pointed him.

              I just think sooner or later the two fighters are going to get caught in a toe-to-toe exchange and that's where it will probably get ugly for Tim, just as it did for Cotto who was winning the opening rounds v Pac.

              We'll see though.
              The opening rounds,with an s??Cotto may have won the 1st rd,but he did not win more then that..Not to mention Cotto is not a versatile fighter,he only fights well coming forward..Then if he is up on the cards he go's into retreat mode..Not effective boxing,all out retreat...It was a good win for Pac,but I can't remember Pac every fighting such a well rounded fighter like Bradley...

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by mathed View Post
                I forgot about Proploddingcough......Pac might as well have not started sparring yet, that guy is like Margarito or Rios, not Bradley. They have this impression of Bradley but it's the wrong one.

                I'll put it this way, if Pac was really taking Bradley seriously, he wouldn't have kicked Ariza out of his camp. Pac is definitely dangerous but he isn't going to be beating Bradley coming in at 60%.
                He's not nearly as bad as Margarito or Rios, but Prov is not Pacquiao's only sparring partner. He's probably only being used to prepare Pacquiao for Tim's strength and such, not his style.

                He also didn't kick Ariza out of his camp. Where do you come up with this stuff? You also notice that Roach, Pacquiao, and Ariza have all made a lot of mention about how Bradley "comes forward, likes to fight toe to toe, is strong" and this could simply be a trick to make Bradley think they think he's one-dimensional. I mean they're talking about him basically being a brawler any chance they get.
                Last edited by samouraď; 04-29-2012, 06:00 PM.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Biolink View Post
                  Just saying that if you are gonna mislead someone, now would be the time for them.

                  This is gonna be one hell of a matchup though. A real good test for the "Pacquiao has trouble with movers" theory.
                  That is true, it could all be a lie. It should be a competitive fight.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by streetwaves View Post
                    He's not nearly as bad as Margarito or Rios, but Prov is not Pacquiao's only sparring partner. He's probably only being used to prepare Pacquiao for Tim's strength and such, not his style.

                    He also didn't kick Ariza out of his camp. Where do you come up with this stuff? You also notice that Roach, Pacquiao, and Ariza have all made a lot of mention about how Bradley "comes forward, likes to fight toe to toe, is strong" and this could simply be a trick to make Bradley think they think he's one-dimensional. I mean they're talking about him basically being a brawler any chance they get.
                    Nah that's how most see Bradley..Roach was saying the same thing about Bradley even last yr..They really believe Bradley is something like a Hatton,and tbh most on this forum believe he is not even in Hatton's class..

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Bradley has an excellent shot at the upset. Im still shocked they took this fight. How often has Bradley even looked vulnerable? How often has he frustrated his opponent with headbutts?

                      Roach probably thinks hes just going to rush pac and swing wide punches but i just dont see that. I see him boxing in and out using his excellent right hand.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP