Originally posted by j.razor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hopkins Claims Robbery: What Did Dawson Do To Win?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Oh you out son View PostALSO:
if you listen to Chad's comments in the post-fight interview. he just praises Hopkins. "he fought a hell of a fight, hes a warrior" (he did say he is a dirty fighter too, but everyone knows this). Hopkins said before "all fights are dirty"
Chad clearly thought the fight was closer than you guys on here, you could tell from his comments. if he thought he dominated, he would have said so he has no problem with being arrogant and ****y if he thinks he whooped Bernards ass, but he knows it was an even fight.
anyway, who cares really. it was a boring ****ty fight. Hopkins should either retire or fight someone less of a technical boxer (like pascal was) who he can school or maybe try a move to crusier like someone else said, that division is weak. I actually wouldnt mind seeing him fight tarver again, or Kayode if he beats tarver
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oh you out son View PostHell ya bro, few intelligent fans are out there!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxingwizard View PostJust admit Hopkins lost convincingly even though Dawson had two cuts in his eyes from all the head-butting. The second cut from a punch but I bet all the head-butting softened his eye. At least Dawson doesn't need to hold when he's throwing a combination. Now if Dawson't didn't have to worry about the cuts, maybe Dawson would have had a higher punch-out, even though I scored rounds 10 & 11 for Dawson. And lol at your previous comment that Dawson wasn't aggressive enough. Dawson was aggressive as he can be.
i understand that chad is one of your favorite fighters. i'm not sure why, since he is an underachiever, notoriously lazy (takes rounds off, doesnt use his ample abilities), and mentally weak. he did NOT beat Hopkins, real boxing fans know this, couldn't ever hurt a man almost 20 years older than him, hopkins landed cleaner too but he would clinch after and biased HBO commentating doesn't notice **** (only Steward could see what was going on "Chad is never really landing anything signficant if you watch carefully, Hopkins is very cagey and is catching them all on the gloves or avoiding them with movement") - these are real quotes from the fight
Comment
-
What is with fans trying to create a controversy where they don't exist? The only controversy with this fight is how one judge scored the fight even. And I knew it would not be long before Calzaghe was dragged back up. And the only controversy in that fight was the fact that it was not scored a unanimous decision for Joe, as it should have been.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Oh you out son View Postwalking towards bernard only ever throwing jabs, and very rarely a straight left or uppercut (these don't land btw so he stopped trying). when i say aggression, i mean punch output aggression. at least when pac fought marquez and lost he was throwing punches the whole time while coming at marquez but chad didn't throw, didn't you hear Scully EVERY round begging him to just let his hands go. "you are too strong and in too good of shape not to overwhelm him, you have to let it go Chad". Scully was clearly worried Hopkins would get the decision because Chad was being mostly ineffective.
i understand that chad is one of your favorite fighters. i'm not sure why, since he is an underachiever, notoriously lazy (takes rounds off, doesnt use his ample abilities), and mentally weak. he did NOT beat Hopkins, real boxing fans know this, couldn't ever hurt a man almost 20 years older than him, hopkins landed cleaner too but he would clinch after and biased HBO commentating doesn't notice **** (only Steward could see what was going on "Chad is never really landing anything signficant if you watch carefully, Hopkins is very cagey and is catching them all on the gloves or avoiding them with movement") - these are real quotes from the fight
I would of like to see Dawson use the straight left more, but he is a right-handed southpaw and Hopkins recognized that which is why he used footwork to force Dawson to use his left hand more. None the less Dawson landed the more telling punches, did less clinching, which is why he got nod.
Comment
-
-
Both fought like grandma's and grandpa's and both need to take up
SEWING QUILTS and sit in rocking chairs
Comment
-
Originally posted by twosweethooks View PostBoth fought like grandma's and grandpa's and both need to take up
SEWING QUILTS and sit in rocking chairs
To the moron above who said Hopkins fans are the most delusional:
- Hopkins is boxing. There is no other boxer who knows more about boxing than him. He is the most deliberate, and methodical fighter. No boxer in the history of the sport has been able to do so much with such limited physical gifts and talent. He is the embodiment of a true champion. When he said "what did Chad do to win the fight?" he summed it up. chad didn't do **** to beat him, Bernard didnt do much more but the fact that he is the champ + he is a ****ing legend + he is 47 years old = should not have lost that fight
Comment
Comment