Dawson vs Hopkins 2 prediction.

[ßringer]

Good analysis of the first fight.

You call this a good analysis of the first fight?

I just spent 5 minutes listening to some effeminate fruitcake expound upon how Dawson NEVER fell for Hopkins' feints, while at the same exact time, video footage showed otherwise : Dawson dropped his guard every ****ing time.

FFS.

Whoever you like in this fight, fine. I'm just saying the first fight didn't last nearly long enough to tell ANYBODY **** about who had the advantage.

[Light_Speed]

You call this a good analysis of the first fight?

I just spent 5 minutes listening to some effeminate fruitcake expound upon how Dawson NEVER fell for Hopkins' feints, while at the same exact time, video footage showed otherwise : Dawson dropped his guard every ****ing time.

FFS.

LOL exactly. This dude don't know shit about boxing. I watched another video on his channel and he said Cotto uses timing as an offensive tool more than anybody besides Floyd and Hop. I had to remind him about a little known fighter named Juan Manuel Marquez.

[Boxingtech718v2]

Dawson going to wax that behind, the only way Hopkins wins is by robbery.

[ßringer]

LOL exactly. This dude don't know shit about boxing. I watched another video on his channel and he said Cotto uses timing as an offensive tool more than anybody besides Floyd and Hop. I had to remind him about a little known fighter named Juan Manuel Marquez.

It was ****ing crazy to watch, I tell you.

"Watch how Dawson doesn't fall for it."

Then he does and jumps back 3 feet like a scared b*tch, and the "analyst" is like "See? Didn't fall for it."

Get some ****ing knowledge of the sport, man. Jesus.

[4Corners]

I got Chad Dawson by UD. Probably mostly because I want Dawson to win the title and than avenge his only loss to Pascal, so that I can see Andre Ward fight Chad Dawson at some point in a big fight.

Wouldn't surprise me if Hopkins pulled it off though. Hopkins have overcome the odds many times, too many times for anyone to question whether or not he can. From beating Trinidad, to Pavlik, to arguably beating Calzaghe, to beating Pascal, you can't count Hopkins out ever.

[Oh you out son]

You call this a good analysis of the first fight?

I just spent 5 minutes listening to some effeminate fruitcake expound upon how Dawson NEVER fell for Hopkins' feints, while at the same exact time, video footage showed otherwise : Dawson dropped his guard every ****ing time.

FFS.

Whoever you like in this fight, fine. I'm just saying the first fight didn't last nearly long enough to tell ANYBODY **** about who had the advantage.

LOL I thought the exact same thing. When the guy jumps back when you feint, that is called falling for the feint. This was a terrible analysis. The guy does sound like a fruit too

Hopkins will mind**** Dawson again before this fight and win

[Oh you out son]

I don't even think Dawson landed one real punch in that round and a half either, not that Hopkins did but Hopkins is a slow starter and he was just feeling Chad out so he can time him. That's why he was using those feints to see how he reacts.

B-Hop is like Floyd in that those 2 are levels above other fighters in how much they think in the ring. Hopkins even more so, you can almost see him thinking in there. Just think about what he is doing and how ridiculous it is. Fighting top competition at LHW at age 47?????

If Hopkins beats Dawson I would put Hopkins in my top 5 Greatest of all time

[ADP02]

By looking at the first one, I would have to say Dawson ... but there is always the possibility that Hopkins has a chance to do what Pascal did to Dawson, .... fight smart.

Still, I see Dawson winning this one.

[sdcluser]

Dawson easily UD Bhop with clean judging. Bhop won't even land that much jab. For those who think Bhop will actual KO Dawson. Pleeeeease.

[[ DUBBZZ ]]

Chad got this.

Dawson in a UD...