It wasn't basically the second fight at all, I scored it a draw, with the KD being the difference. The 3rd fight was not a draw and there were no knockdowns, Marquez winning more rounds is what won the fight.
Nothing to do with Delahoya, he has enough problems without bringing Trinidad up . But yeah, if Tito didn't cheat in that fight against a rookie, the win would look a lot better.
Thanks for describing how it was like the 2nd fight without the KD, you're not a bright one are ya
What was worse Mayweather's domination of JMM or Hopkins humiliation of Tito?
We know hopkins is tough, dirty, and smart in the ring... One of the best fighters this era and the oldest champion of all time! Tito got schooled most of the rounds until they stopped it... Before that Tito was unbeaten in welterweight and jr middleweight. Unlike Floyd, he didn't have to moved up weight to fight the best middleweights but he did and got beat fair and square. Marquez is always in a war, giving the fans excitement!! But he got beat in his biggest fights (robbery or not).
I have to go with Tito, JMM is a great fighter but as far as resume goes, Tito takes it. Tito was undefeated at welter, he went up to 154 and went right to the best guys in that divison the current champs, Reid and Vargas, then he went up to 160 and fought the champ, Joppy. Then he went up againts one of the best Middleweights of all time and got phuked up. That is nothing to be ashamed about Titos best weight was 147-154. And just a fyi..when he beat Campas and Oba Carr they were both undefeated fighters..Those who say JMM will go down as being greater than Tito didnt watch Tito fight in the 1990's..the only guy to make DLH run..He was a killer in the ring.
Comment