Entertaining fights you could watch again

[$tate of Mind]

[-Spinal-]

Mayweather-Gatti.
Hopkins-Pascal I and II.
Taylor-Winky.
Marquez-Pacquiao I and II.
Mosley-Winky II.

[The Surgeon]

Michael Gomez vs Alex Arthur

Juan Marquez vs Jandaeng
Juan Marquez vs Jaca

Brewster vs Ettiene

Ettiene vs Clay Bey

Jirov vs Mesi
Jirov vs Letterlough

Ayala vs Tapia

Cooper vs Mercer

[The Surgeon]

Mayweather-Gatti.
Hopkins-Pascal I and II.
Taylor-Winky.
Marquez-Pacquiao I and II.
Mosley-Winky II.

I didnt really care much for the Hopkins vs Pascal or Mosley vs Wink fights to be fair. Taylor vs Winky is underrated though, i really enjoyed that one and while im talking about it i had Taylor 1 point up and thought a draw was fair in a fight so close. Winky was disappointing in his actions afterwards

[Something Jr]

Some recent favorites of mines;
Maidana-Ortiz
Rios-Antillon
Khan-Peterson
Prescott-Alvarado

[-Spinal-]

I didnt really care much for the Hopkins vs Pascal or Mosley vs Wink fights to be fair. Taylor vs Winky is underrated though, i really enjoyed that one and while im talking about it i had Taylor 1 point up and thought a draw was fair in a fight so close. Winky was disappointing in his actions afterwards

I thought Hopkins was really pushed against a very energetic fighter in Pascal, and that's why Hopkins was so offensive in that fight, for his standards. I thought both fights were entertaining, especially the second one.

I like Mosley-Winky cause Mosley did better than the first fight, it was close. My favorite moment of the fight was when Winky put his hands down in the 5th round, to welcome some Mosley punches...only to hold on for dear life after getting hit, trying his best to not look stunned, when he was actually stunned. He realized it was ******.

I guess it depends what entertaining means. My favorite fighters all dominate their fights, they're not really exciting. But I find dominating performances entertaining. Also, I hate rewatching fights with crappy quality, I prefer rewatching recent fights, with HD. Rather than fights from back when there was no HD.

[The Surgeon]

I thought Hopkins was really pushed against a very energetic fighter in Pascal, and that's why Hopkins was so offensive in that fight, for his standards. I thought both fights were entertaining, especially the second one.

I like Mosley-Winky cause Mosley did better than the first fight, it was close. My favorite moment of the fight was when Winky put his hands down in the 5th round, to welcome some Mosley punches...only to hold on for dear life after getting hit, trying his best to not look stunned, when he was actually stunned. He realized it was ******.

I guess it depends what entertaining means. My favorite fighters all dominate their fights, they're not really exciting. But I find dominating performances entertaining. Also, I hate rewatching fights with crappy quality, I prefer rewatching recent fights, with HD. Rather than fights from back when there was no HD.

That was crazy stuff from Wink, Birmingham went ape ***** at him for that in the corner im sure!

I know what u mean, PBF vs Gatti was highly entertaining to me as was Jones vs Hall! I do prefer a level playing field and some back and forth myself though...

There are so many great fighters and great fights from years gone by but it can feel a bit like work watching them in such bad quality. I make a point to watch anyway but i hear you

[ChiTown2Diego]

Barrera vs Kennedy McKinney

[DLT]

I didnt really care much for the Hopkins vs Pascal or Mosley vs Wink fights to be fair. Taylor vs Winky is underrated though, i really enjoyed that one and while im talking about it i had Taylor 1 point up and thought a draw was fair in a fight so close. Winky was disappointing in his actions afterwards

i bet $100 and won $1,500 on a draw for that fight. Loved it

[Weebler I]

I recall this fight being a classic, it was before Maidana v Petrov last year, it's Pereya v Aguirre someone watch it again and tell me if it's as good as I remember: