Beating Floyd vs Beating Manny

[cixthree]

Which would mean more & why..

[-MAKAVELLI-]

cong****...i think this is your 1000th Floyd/PAC related thread!


thank you for all your originality

[SpeedKillz]

what a ******ed simple minded thread. floyd is undefeated, obviously it means more to dethrone him than to beat a 3 loss manny pacquiao.

how many may-pac threads can you make in one day, seriously?

[turbotime]

Beating Floyd right now for Pac would probably be a Top 10 Win All-time in terms of significance.

A lot of people expect Floyd to win handily.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

. floyd is undefeated, obviously it means more to dethrone him than to beat a 3 loss manny pacquiao.

YAY!! another WIN for Floyd over PAC


i think the TS is happy now...mission accomplished


now its time to make thread 1001

"What Trunks Should Floyd Wear On May 5th"

[Khalid X]

Being a prime fighter (his size) and actually getting a fight with Floyd is a bigger accomplishment that either of those you just listed.

[-Spinal-]

what a ******ed simple minded thread. floyd is undefeated, obviously it means more to dethrone him than to beat a 3 loss manny pacquiao.

how many may-pac threads can you make in one day, seriously?

I see what you mean but how much does the 0 really mean?

What means more, convincingly beating Manny Pacquiao or convincingly beating the undefeated Adrien Broner? IMO Pacquiao.

Or what about convincingly beating Sergio Martinez, or convincingly beating Nathan Cleverly? Definitely Sergio.

If you're the better fighter, then it means a lot more to beat you, regardless of 0.

Floyd is simply the better and more difficult fighter to beat.

[-§unny-]

Beating both of the fighters will be huge for anyone.
But if you compare between them its obviously Floyd because 42 have tried and 42 have failed, while on the other end Pac has been beat convincingly and controversially and also been KTFO before.

[SpeedKillz]

I see what you mean but how much does the 0 really mean?

What means more, convincingly beating Manny Pacquiao or convincingly beating the undefeated Adrien Broner? IMO Pacquiao.

Or what about convincingly beating Sergio Martinez, or convincingly beating Nathan Cleverly? Definitely Sergio.

If you're the better fighter, then it means a lot more to beat you, regardless of 0.

Floyd is simply the better and more difficult fighter to beat.

the question was between floyd and manny, not broner or martinez or cleverly, so I answered the question. it means much more to beat undefeated floyd mayweather than it does to beat 3 loss (possibly 4 loss from his last fight) manny pacquiao. thats the more obvious reason. the fact that floyd is a better fighter and it means more to beat him is important on another level, but I was tryin to keep it simple...

[cixthree]

I see what you mean but how much does the 0 really mean?

What means more, convincingly beating Manny Pacquiao or convincingly beating the undefeated Adrien Broner? IMO Pacquiao.

Or what about convincingly beating Sergio Martinez, or convincingly beating Nathan Cleverly? Definitely Sergio.

If you're the better fighter, then it means a lot more to beat you, regardless of 0.

Floyd is simply the better and more difficult fighter to beat.

Thank you..... These ******ed a$$ ******s are the first to say "Floyds 0 means NOTHING" or "Being undefeated means NOTHING". But are the first to admit that taking Floyds 0 means more than beating "The P4P, greatest to ever live Manny Pacquiao"... LOL
Self ownage is the best ownage...

@SnakaVelli. My 1000th thread, but you're 1500th comment (Stop following me lady