Things in Boxing that piss me off

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Funky_Monk
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 1698
    • 52
    • 5
    • 8,368

    #41
    Originally posted by CubanGuyNYC
    I understand that most fans use the words "hold" and "clinch" interchangeably, but there's a distinction. You don't see the difference, so I'll try to tackle the problem from another angle.

    The rules you cite use the word "hold" in the following rule: "You can't hold your opponent and hit him at the same time..." Yet another rule uses the word "clinch": "When the referee breaks you from a clinch, you have to take a full step back..." The writer isn't using different words for creative purposes. Specific words are being used because "clinch" and "hold" have similar but different shades of meaning.

    If clinching is illegal, why does the rule say, "When the referee breaks you from a clinch, you have to take a full step back; you cannot immediately hit your opponent--that's called 'hitting on the break' and is illegal." Why doesn't the ref issue a warning or deduct a point for clinching in the first place? Because clinching is legal, that's why.
    You say they are different as others do in the thread, yet there has been no definition of holding and clinching.
    Other than some weird anology to hands and fingers which bears little resemblance.
    I'm not taking a side here just asking for clarification.

    Comment

    • intoccabile
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2006
      • 3038
      • 110
      • 0
      • 10,249

      #42
      Originally posted by Funky_Monk
      You say they are different as others do in the thread, yet there has been no definition of holding and clinching.
      Other than some weird anology to hands and fingers which bears little resemblance.
      I'm not taking a side here just asking for clarification.
      a clinch and a hold are different. A Fighter who is CLINCHING can still fight whilst doing so, but a figher who is HOLDING can not fight while doing so. A proper clinch keeps an arm free, both men can work out of that and 'fight out of it'. A hold though, is when a fighter hugs his man up and doesn't allow him or even himself to get any work off, that warrants for a referee to break them up, because they can not fight out of that.

      What Devon was doing to Marco was holding. What ward did with kessler was clinching.

      Comment

      • Jack Napier
        Whores on Our Cul de Sac
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 8668
        • 812
        • 424
        • 16,030

        #43
        mandatories
        in a stale division, so be it, fight who the organizations want
        but in a division with good names, let the champs fight good comp
        don't cockblock unification matches either
        guys get stripped and big fights get blocked for ****** mandatories
        it's annoying as hell

        Comment

        • Elotero
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2009
          • 2663
          • 264
          • 359
          • 14,232

          #44
          Originally posted by Jack Napier
          mandatories
          in a stale division, so be it, fight who the organizations want
          but in a division with good names, let the champs fight good comp
          don't cockblock unification matches either
          guys get stripped and big fights get blocked for ****** mandatories
          it's annoying as hell
          Co-sign.

          Stop blocking good/big fights with BS.

          Stop banning dudes for exposing up and comers. Collazo and Pirog immediately come to mind. Instead of trying to sign them up right after the fight, they ****ing ban them and trash their names.

          Low risk high reward fights rather than the obvious #1 vs #2 guy fights.

          Comment

          • ElMeroChingon
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 3817
            • 236
            • 87
            • 10,336

            #45
            Originally posted by intoccabile
            Clinching isn't illegal. Holding is.

            There is a difference.
            Yeah i know, but legalization doesn't stop it from being annoying.

            Comment

            • pesticid
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2006
              • 7236
              • 456
              • 500
              • 20,597

              #46
              Originally posted by ElMeroChingon
              Yeah i know, but legalization doesn't stop it from being annoying.
              Lol at the posters trying to say that clinching is different than holding. You can't even hold with one arm and punch with the other, it's not allowed. Why am I even bothering...

              Comment

              • ElMeroChingon
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2010
                • 3817
                • 236
                • 87
                • 10,336

                #47
                Originally posted by pesticid
                Lol at the posters trying to say that clinching is different than holding. You can't even hold with one arm and punch with the other, it's not allowed. Why am I even bothering...
                Whether it's illegal or not, it's happening and it needs to stop.

                Comment

                • jtiger777
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Mar 2011
                  • 2569
                  • 64
                  • 136
                  • 2,721

                  #48
                  whats boxing without clinching??????????? its a part of the game buddy and should be used in certain situations... but not all the time

                  Comment

                  • pesticid
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2006
                    • 7236
                    • 456
                    • 500
                    • 20,597

                    #49
                    Originally posted by ElMeroChingon
                    Whether it's illegal or not, it's happening and it needs to stop.
                    It is illegal and every time it happens there needs to be a warning, three warnings and deduct a point. That's it, enforce the rules but they are not gonna do that against Bhop, Ward, Wlad and Devon - no way. Imagine if Hopkins didn't hold against Zaghe he would've been undressed as a fighter a submerged in the later rounds.

                    Comment

                    • jtiger777
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 2569
                      • 64
                      • 136
                      • 2,721

                      #50
                      Originally posted by turbotime
                      Or when a fighter has a good performance, everyone jumps on the bandwagon.
                      They have a bad performance, everyone jumps off and calls that fighter "exposed".
                      this is one of my biggest dislikes in the boxing community

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP