Martinez is 5'9; Margarito is 5'10. Why can't Pac fight Sergio?

[VoodooChild]

Didn't you say Manny fights at his walk around weight?

He walks around at 154. Couple that with those special Ariza shakes. I don't see the problem.

Was Marg not bigger at 150 than Serg when he fought Cintron at 154?

Ahh there you go again, what is your source for his walk around weight?

[BoxingGenius27]

Ahh there you go again, what is your source for his walk around weight?

Lol I gave you a source man.

It wasn't a blog.

[VoodooChild]

Lol I gave you a source man.

It wasn't a blog.

Dude that wasn't a source, it was reporter saying that Pac walked around at 154 without any references or quotes to back it up. Are you really still at this?

[BoxingGenius27]

Dude that wasn't a source, it was reporter saying that Pac walked around at 154 without any references or quotes to back it up. Are you really still at this?

Well if you want to think they were making it up, then by all means, believe what you like.

Honestly, it's more than enough for me.

[VoodooChild]

Well if you want to think they were making it up, then by all means, believe what you like.

Honestly, it's more than enough for me.

What?? I never said that he was making it up, all I asked was what was his source. If he has none that's fine but I'm not going to take it as fact.

You've been at this all day, is discrediting Manny really that important to you?

[BoxingGenius27]

What?? I never said that he was making it up, all I asked was what was his source. If he has none that's fine but I'm not going to take it as fact.

You've been at this all day, is discrediting Manny really that important to you?

Why don't you ask the writer of the article either why she's making up numbers or where she got her info from; then let us know what you find out. Maybe she's trying to discredit Pac, I don't know.

Didn't you say Manny has a paper title at 154? Although I agree with you, you have been discrediting as well. I call it voicing your opinion as I do.

[VoodooChild]

Why don't you ask the writer of the article either why she's making up numbers or where she got her info from; then let us know what you find out. Maybe she's trying to discredit Pac, I don't know.

Didn't you say Manny has a paper title at 154? Although I agree with you, you have been discrediting as well. I call it voicing your opinion as I do.

So will you take anything that's printed in an article without a quote or reference as fact?

[BoxingGenius27]

So will you take anything that's printed in an article without a quote or reference as fact?

So as long as an article has a quote followed by said Ariza/Pac/Arum/whoever, that's enough for you?

[BoxingGenius27]

So will you take anything that's printed in an article without a quote or reference as fact?

If HBO is commentating a fight, why do you believe anything they say even if they say according too?

Wouldn't you have to speak to whoever "according too" actually is to verify?

I'll show you an article right now where someone from Team Pac give's Pac's walk around weight. This won't be enough for you because Pac didn't say it in an interview.

But I do understand what you're saying. I don't believe a lot of guys on here just because "they say" it's true. But if they show me an article, I tend to take the author's word for it.

If you don't want to believe that Pac walks around at 154, that's fine. But according to the article I provided, it still stands. Until you provide otherwise, I don't know what to tell you.

Anyway, it's been good talking to you. I'm afraid this convo is going anywhere.

[VoodooChild]

So as long as an article has a quote followed by said Ariza/Pac/Arum/whoever, that's enough for you?

It would depend on what was said. If the article has and actual quote or reference in it then it can be cross checked with other pages, articles or reports. The article you gave had no such reference with that statement. The author could be guessing, he/she could have heard it through another party or they could have heard it straight from Manny. We will never know but I'm sure that if they were doing more than speculating they would have included a reference.

Now, you never answered my question, here it is again:

"So will you take anything that's printed in an article without a quote or reference as fact?"