every fight needs to be for a belt and i think even the loser of a title fight should get a belt.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Mares vs Morel Now For Vacant WBC Super Bantam Title
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postevery fight needs to be for a belt and i think even the loser of a title fight should get a belt.
The WBC will be naming me Interim Super Emeritus Champion in Recess as soon as my check clears
Comment
-
Why??? Abner is already the IBF Champ. Abner has been the WBC silver champ since Darchinyan in 2010, and at least Morel is ranked highly at BW, #4 by the RING. It's a pretty good defense for Mares. I just don't see why it's for the title. I thought that Yamanaka guy was the WBC BW champ, and he's fighting Darchinyan in Japan in April.
4 belts is just wrong, it's messed up stuff in boxing. At the very most, have two belts, at the most. Moreno and Mares would be the champs at 118, and if they didn't unify eventually, people would have to fight them for the titles. That's the way it should be. Have two titles max for each weight class, though it'll never happen.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 4CornersKid View PostWhy??? Abner is already the IBF Champ. Abner has been the WBC silver champ since Darchinyan in 2010, and at least Morel is ranked highly at BW, #4 by the RING. It's a pretty good defense for Mares. I just don't see why it's for the title. I thought that Yamanaka guy was the WBC BW champ, and he's fighting Darchinyan in Japan in April.
4 belts is just wrong, it's messed up stuff in boxing. At the very most, have two belts, at the most. Moreno and Mares would be the champs at 118, and if they didn't unify eventually, people would have to fight them for the titles. That's the way it should be. Have two titles max for each weight class, though it'll never happen.
Comment
Comment