Pac new deal, 70/30 split of revenue.

[hugh grant]

lol people think this is a good idea... with so much $ at stake don't rule out a possibility of a robbery if it goes to a decision. So it may sound awesome but its not a viable option.

Why? Boxers who have been desperate to get a fight made, have made winner takes all offers before this!

Even the loser would make so much money, so i think i think you are scaremongering and paranoid. It is a viable option there doesnt seem to be too much common sense coming from floyds side so this looks attractive option and welcome.

[Phil Ivey]

Why? Boxers who have been desperate to get a fight made, have made winner takes all offers before this!

Even the loser would make so much money, so i think i think you are scaremongering and paranoid. It is a viable option there doesnt seem to be too much common sense coming from floyds side so this looks attractive option and welcome.

There's a fine line between an offer and an actual stipulation in the contract. Name me a fight where winner took all, go. We're not talking about a mere 2-3 mill on top for the winner.

[al-Xander]

Don't know why Floyd fanboys are against this. They're supposed to be countering 80/20 or 90/10 for the winner/loser. Floyd fanboys who have been saying Floyd would stop Pac in the 8th round. Floyd would school Pac. Floyd is da best. Pac is just an overrated bum who fought nothing but bums. Just proves that they don't really mean it when they say such silly things.