Comments Thread For: Vitali: I Would Have Rather Died Than Lose To That Creep!

[Weebler I]

He knows Chisora gave him hell but he can't give credit, he has to create excuses just like Haye talking about a toe. Vitali's arm was not injured, styles make fights and Chisora will always give the Klitchko's problems because he's an inside fighter.

Now Vitali is talking about how Chisora hit Haye first and Haye had to defend himself. This is just because he wants a fight with Haye who throws wide shots and not Chisora who will kick his ass for 12 rounds.

A lot of truth in this post even though some will be reluctant to accept it.

I reckon there's a chance chisora was on something (drugs or peds) for the vitali fight, It was unusual, He seemed supercharged before, during and after the fight. And from what I have seen most boxers after hearing the final bell, they have a sense of ease, sense of humanity, where they congratulate there foe, and shake hands or hug energy-less from all their effort in the ring. However Chisora seemed to be different, he was still buzzing with anger, he looked tormented. I taught it was odd

He was chilled post-fight, but the Klitschkos were angry because of the spitting, they came after him (watch the video), Chisora just wasn't going anywhere.

I watched him at the press conference before the tyson fury fight, total different man, so calm, chilled and relaxed.

Also, my reason for saying he may have been on something, is also connected to how well he preformed in the fight, he never stopped throwing, punches, and gave vitali a good fight. Much much better than people had expected.
Maybe I am just over thinking the situation, maybe there is nothing in it.
What do you think?

It's not impossible, but it should be remembered Chisora isn't the one with the rep. for having used steroids.

[jimmy1569]

Vitali is one hell lot of a hypocrite and I can see through the lies.
He knows Chisora gave him hell but he can't give credit, he has to create excuses just like Haye talking about a toe. Vitali's arm was not injured, styles make fights and Chisora will always give the Klitchko's problems because he's an inside fighter.
Now Vitali is talking about how Chisora hit Haye first and Haye had to defend himself. This is just because he wants a fight with Haye who throws wide shots and not Chisora who will kick his ass for 12 rounds.

Dude.. seriously... the difference here is Vitali makes excuses when he's WON 10 rds.. not LOST 10 rds... Vitali claims injuries & cuts when he's dominating or beating you down handily.. outboxing & outslugging you.. That's when you know it's legit. He quit while he was ahead against Byrd... he didn't quit while he was ahead against Lewis even when one side of his face looked like it was out of a macabre horror flick..




He retired & gave up his belt because of numerous & various injuries before facing Hasim Rahman...he could've went through with the bouts at much less than 100% & then made up excuses for faring poorly in defeat BUT HE DIDN'T because he has pride & self respect. I believe even though he did suffer similar shoulder ailments vs Chisora & Byrd.. the Byrd fight required surgery afterwards & was a bit more severe... when has Vitali EVER stopped throwing leather before or after Byrd?




He was also less experience & i believe he might've panicked... thinking about the consequences to his career if the shoulder had gotten worse for wear for 9 more minutes. He probably couldn't bear the thought of potentially losing to Byrd in that fashion because of immense pride & halted the action.. thinking he did NOT have to deal with it any longer... NOT knowing the immense backlash it would have.. he quit out of pride in that fight while KNOWING full well he was winning the fight with ease. In the Chisora fight.. he was fending off an aggressive Chisora with one arm but didn't panic & drew from experience.. Quitting against an agressive Chisora is alot different than quitting against a passive Byrd..





It's the mentality here that Vitali is trying to explain between two completely different style of fighters. When one is taking it to you... you can't back down as it's automatically viewed as a sign of weakness.. Byrd was NOT taking it to Vitali... IT WAS Vitali who was making that fight & being the aggressor throughout up until the point he wasn't capable of doing it any longer because the shoulder was gradually getting worse throughout the fight... other than a few Byrd flurries towards the end of the bout when Vitali was virtually defenseless.. Byrd wasn't providing that sense of urgency.. where Vitali had to fight back to protect his manhood & defend it.. same goes with the Lewis bout.. just trying to explain to you guys the mentality that's involved here.



A gUY like Vitali has immense pride.. he thinks he's the toughest & the strongest fighter out there... that night in Berlin.. Germany there was not the same urgency.. due to the severity of his injury but more importantly what made the decision to quit easier was how he was handily winning & THE TYPE OF OPPOSITION THAT WAS IN FRONT OF HIM IN BYRD.. in his mind he thought peeps would understand that he quit because of injury incurred.. & not because of his foe & what he was doing. Vitali was fighting his shoulder that night & while Byrd was there in the ring.. he was basically an extra to the big picture that was involved.

[jimmy1569]

Ths post deserved to be crapped on so have some red for it.

There's a big difference between makng an excuse for a lopsided loss and
letting people know why he didn't throw the left han as much as he usually does in a lopsided win.

I love the fact that NOW everyone thinks Vitali is 'vincible' & that age has finally caught up to him as if his lackluster performance had anything to do with anything age related. First of all when Vitali gets taken the distance it's front page news.. secondly a "poor" performance for him is NEARLY losing three rds in a fight for the first time in his career.. the haters should realize how dominant Vitali really is.. that a weak performance by him is considered by virtually every past great before him as a dominant one.. If this was Ali.. smoking Frazier in this fashion to a unanimous decision.. it'd be hailed as a masterpiece.. LENNOX over Tua WAS considered dominant taming of an aggressive fighter.. This fight if anything should've proved to everyone that Vitali is the most dominant fighter in boxing history as his flaws are past greats strengths & doing it with ONLY one arm throughout the bout is amazing.