Miguel Vazquez vs. Adrien Broner @135

[MJ223]

prescott hurt him visibly, prescott is just a ****ty boxer who couldnt finish. and like i said about alvarez, we are talking about saul alvarez but lets not act like this is a prime alvarez we are talking about, we are talking about a little boy, a teenager. i dont even know why ur brining up that/those fights.

Prescott hurt him.... Ok.... U think Broner hits harder then Prescott???

Canelo at 147 (and who knows what he rehydrated to) hits harder then AB at 130..... Or do u disagree???

[Rome-By-Ko]

He fought a bigger guy out of of his weight class with some pop.... Didn't get stopped (Canelo).... Fought a guy with turn ur lights off power (Prescott) didn't get stopped.... What makes anyone think AB will??? Does he have more power then either of those guys listed WHEN Miguel fought them??? NO

So again I ask if they couldn't do it what makes ppl think AB can???

Broner is more likely to catch him Vasquez with a shot he does not see..Prescott and Alvarez are not that good tbh,Broner has a lot of potential..I don't think he would knock Vasquez out,but it can happen..Broner has very fast hands and good power..

[Kagami Taiga]

Prescott hurt him.... Ok.... U think Broner hits harder then Prescott???

Canelo at 147 (and who knows what he rehydrated to) hits harder then AB at 130..... Or do u disagree???

ive seen nothing that suggests prescott hits harder than broner. their ko percentages are very similar and while prescott has fought better fighters, he hasnt knocked out any good ones except china chinned khan.

and stop bringing up canelo. it does nothing to help your argument. even now canelo isnt a one punch knockout artist and back then he was what? 16 or 17? seriously, theres no point.

[MJ223]

ive seen nothing that suggests prescott hits harder than broner. their ko percentages are very similar and while prescott has fought better fighters, he hasnt knocked out any good ones except china chinned khan.

and stop bringing up canelo. it does nothing to help your argument. even now canelo isnt a one punch knockout artist and back then he was what? 16 or 17? seriously, theres no point.

Prescott has fought the better fighters while maintaining a similar KO% hmm and who has KO'ed Khan since Prescott since he is china chinned???

I bring up Canelo because he has more power then Broner regardless of age.... Naturally bigger guy or do u disagree???

[MJ223]

Broner is more likely to catch him Vasquez with a shot he does not see..Prescott and Alvarez are not that good tbh,Broner has a lot of potential..I don't think he would knock Vasquez out,but it can happen..Broner has very fast hands and good power..

Cool.... But if the KO doesn't come and he has to go 12 (AB only done once) who does that favor??? That's why I picked Vazquez

Right now Broner has a punchers chance but I wouldn't favor him to take a decision from a guy who has been there before and has seen things Broner has yet to.... Down the road maybe it will change.... But ATM I favor MV

[Kagami Taiga]

Prescott has fought the better fighters while maintaining a similar KO% hmm and who has KO'ed Khan since Prescott since he is china chinned???

I bring up Canelo because he has more power then Broner regardless of age.... Naturally bigger guy or do u disagree???

1. idc who koed khan since then, the guy doesnt have a good chin. thats a fact. prescott wasnt the first one to make him shaky at lighweight and the other guys who did werent punchers at all.

2. canelo might be naturally bigger, but that does not mean anything in terms of power. u can say the same thing about canelo being bigger than prescott as well, but canleo didnt hurt vasquez, prescott did. so ur argument is faulty. fighting bigger guys is not equal to fighting more powerful guys i dunno why ppl get these dumb ideas.

[vacon04]

Vazquez is better than most people think he is. This would be a hard fight for Broner because Titere is slick, tall and has good ring IQ. If Broner could win a fight like this then I would give him credit. Right now is hard to give him a lot of credit when he's fighting some Argentinian unknown boxer and a green Eloy Perez.

[MJ223]

1. idc who koed khan since then, the guy doesnt have a good chin. thats a fact. prescott wasnt the first one to make him shaky at lighweight and the other guys who did werent punchers at all.

2. canelo might be naturally bigger, but that does not mean anything in terms of power. u can say the same thing about canelo being bigger than prescott as well, but canleo didnt hurt vasquez, prescott did. so ur argument is faulty. fighting bigger guys is not equal to fighting more powerful guys i dunno why ppl get these dumb ideas.

He doesn't have a good chin because he got KO'ed once???

Ur 2nd point..... A gifted 130 lber hits harder then a guy who has shown some pop at a much higher weight.... Ok if that's what u want to believe....

Wilfredo Gomez 122 doesn't hit harder then Chavez at 130..... Because of the weight difference..... Doesn't matter how much power Gomez had at 122....

And that was only 8lbs..... 130-147 is a bigger gap can Broner have that same power when he moves up??? We don't know.... Canelo has shown that he can punch at different weights.... So ATM I give the power edge to Canelo and also Prescott.... There is nothing on Broners current resume to think otherwise

[Hayehammer]

VS


Who wins?

Dude you should be a promoter! I think vasquez style is very boring but effective! I can see him frustrating broner with his style alot!

[ramses07]

good fight.... cant call it.

at this point vazquez has the better resume, and can probably take broners power well since he was fighting at weights he shouldnt have been fighting at and didnt get ko-ed.

both of there recent fights werent against great opponents either.

but man besides this fight theyre a lot of good fights at 135

broner vs gamboa, linares, marquez, vazquez, lundy, guerrero.

any of these would be great