Maxboxing article, I thought it was an interesting read. I understand this topic has been exhausted but I just want everyone's opinion in poll form.
================================================== ======
What Floyd Mayweather’s small but vocal fan base and HBO’s boxing announcers called a “virtuoso performance” this past Saturday, I called a waste of time – practically masturbating in public.
Mayweather’s one-sided beating of faded former 140-pound titlist Sharmba Mitchell served no purpose (other than to line the Pretty Boy’s already fat pockets with more easy money). This opinion elicited a reaction from Mayweather’s diehard supporters – all four of them. In the interest of fair play I’ll print the emails in this commentary piece, but before I do that I’d like make a statement to Mayweather’s most ardent fans who believe that I have some sort of beef with their favorite fighter.
I have no hatred for Mayweather, only opinions of his recent ring work. Right now, I’m not impressed with him. That’s all. There’s no agenda against him or bias towards him. If you think he’s the best fighter in the world, good for you. If you think he’s the best fighter who ever lived, I’m happy for you. If you think I have some kind of personal problem with him, you’re wrong, but you have every right to think that I hate him and you are more than welcome to let me know this.
All I ask is that you realize that from my perspective, you are no different from any other fan of elite fighters whose primes preceded Mayweather’s. Oscar De La Hoya had his Golden Boys. Roy Jones had his Roy Boys. Mayweather has his Pretty Boys. I know you think your guy is the best in the business, and maybe you are right, but you dudes are no different than the fanatics who jumped my ass for criticizing De La Hoya, Jones, Felix Trinidad, the Klitschkos and many other stars who have come and gone. No matter how awesome you think your guy is, the time will come that he will be brought down to earth, and when that happens, I know that I won’t be bothered with your frustrated emails any longer.
I know, I know, you think Mayweather’s unbeatable. He’ll wipe his pretty little butt with every top dog from 140 to 154 pounds. I know you really believe this, so I’m not mad at you. I’m mad at Mayweather because he’s the one who is supposed to believe this. However his actions (or non-action) over the past three years tell me otherwise.
Your emails:
DOUGIE’S A STRAIGHT UP HATER
man are you biased. your a straight up hater. that is all i have to say, thank you. – Lam Vo
You’re wrong, but thanks for keeping it short.
NOT FAIR TO MAYWEATHER
Ok Ok yes Mayweather is fighting opponents without a chance in hell to win, however he is getting much too much flak for not fighting better opposition. Not once have I seen any criticism of other 140lb fighters. It always Mayweather vs this one or that one. How about asking when is Cotto going to fight Mayweather rather than the other way around. How bout Hatton v Cotto, or Cotto v Tszyu or Hatton v Witter. How bout getting on Judah for not fighting Magarito, or Margarito for not fighting Judah. My point is only Mayweather is getting flak for not having a big fight, and none of the other 140-147 fighters are. I agree Magarito-Mayweather would be a very interesting fight, however wouldn’t Judah-Margarito be just as entertaining.
Am I wrong? Is the criticism of Mayweather warranted? If so why not of Hatton, Cotton and Judah. Just want to know your thoughts – Russell
When you call out Winky Wright and Oscar De La Hoya and threaten to fight them at 154 pounds but are not willing to fight Antonio Margarito for $7 million at 147 pounds you are going to get some criticism – at least from me. I’m not going to expect the same things from Cotto and Hatton that I expect from Mayweather because A) they haven’t been on the world-class scene since 1998 like PBF, and B) they don’t claim to be the best fighter in the world, pound for pound, the way your boy does.
Mayweather is not getting flak for not having “a big fight” this year. He had a big fight, the Arturo Gatti blowout. He’s getting flak for not having a COMPETITIVE fight in the last THREE years, and for not doing his part to get in the ring with the fighters he knows will bring the heat. There’s a difference.
WHAT’S YOUR PROBLEM WITH MAYWEATHER?
You say that the Mayweather bout was not really a welterweight bout because Mitchell was not a "real" welterweight, well, one of your loves, Erik Morales, fought a guy named Zahir Raheem in his first "lightweight" bout and if I remember correctly, Raheem was a featherweight. I don't "get" all the problems with Mayweather. Mitchell, before he got blown out by Kostya Tsyzu, was thought of as being a real threat to Kostya. He is a slick southpaw, also. And, I think it's great to watch the talent of the pretty boy.
You had Erik Morales up on the P4P list for beating Jesus Chavez and Carlos Hernandez but wait... Mayweather already beat them. How 'bout the fight of the decade?... Jose Luis Castillo vs Chico... wait... Mayweather already beat both of them!
Give Mayweather some credit.. he's the best boxer on the planet, and if you don't find it fun to watch his skill level, then that's your problem, but, I make sure I watch all of his fights, he's incredible to watch. And Tony Margarito? The guy lost to a southpaw that isn't really even that good in Daniel Santos, and has been 2-1 in his last 3 fights. You really think that pretty boy is scared of him? Gimme a break. Thats' all. Peace – Bob
Mayweather’s action (or non-action in Margarito’s case) speak a lot louder than your words, Bob. Like I told Jay from Florida in this week’s Monday Mail Bag, if you think Margarito will get beat by Mayweather because he lost a close technical decision to a 6-foot-1 junior middleweight who has punching power then you don’t understand that styles make fights or that size definitely matters in boxing. Not only would Margarito give Mayweather hell, so would Santos!
Before I get to my “love”, Erik Morales, I should note that his fans used to hound me about not ranking him higher in my pound-for-pound list. They hated that I rated Barrera, who didn’t look so hot in their rematch, so far above him. (This was in mid-2003, before Barrera was KTFO by PacMan, and before Morales stepped up to 130 pounds.) However, after ’04 and the first quarter of this year, I believe I elevated El Terrible to where he belongs, top five pound-for-pound, based on his victories over Jesus Chavez and Carlos Hernandez, and the close and competitive 24 rounds he battled with Barrera and Pacquiao. (He has since fallen from the top five due to his loss to Raheem, who by the way had been fighting at lightweight before he fought El Terrible, but not out of the top 10; I give the man credit for taking on a young contender with a difficult style – when is the last time Mayweather has done that?)
I’m well aware that Mayweather beat Chavez and Hernandez back in 2001. Mayweather was the no. 1 junior lightweight in ’01; in fact, that year I ranked him no. 5 among the best the 130-pound fighters of all time (behind only Alexis Arguello, Sandy Saddler, Julio Cesar Chavez and Azumah Nelson).
However, I give more credit for recent accomplishments in my pound-for-pound list, and personally, I think Morales’ victories over Chavez and Hernandez were more impressive than the Pretty Boy’s. Why? Two reasons: 1) They held world titles when Morales fought them, thus Terrible unified two major belts (something Mayweather has never accomplished), and 2) Morales is a natural 122 pounder who beat two natural 130 pounders (and, in my opinion, more mature and confident versions of Chavez and Hernandez than Mayweather faced).
Regarding Corrales-Castillo I, why should Mayweather get any credit for the blood, sweat and tears THEY shed in the ring this past May? I give Mayweather credit for beating the January of 2001 version of Corrales. I give him credit for edging out the 2002 version of Castillo. Anything Corrales or Castillo has accomplished in the ring since ’01 and ’02, the credit goes to them, not Mayweather. (I don’t see anybody retroactively giving Javier Jauregui credit for what Castillo has accomplished since he twice stopped the Sonora mauler.)
================================================== ======
What Floyd Mayweather’s small but vocal fan base and HBO’s boxing announcers called a “virtuoso performance” this past Saturday, I called a waste of time – practically masturbating in public.
Mayweather’s one-sided beating of faded former 140-pound titlist Sharmba Mitchell served no purpose (other than to line the Pretty Boy’s already fat pockets with more easy money). This opinion elicited a reaction from Mayweather’s diehard supporters – all four of them. In the interest of fair play I’ll print the emails in this commentary piece, but before I do that I’d like make a statement to Mayweather’s most ardent fans who believe that I have some sort of beef with their favorite fighter.
I have no hatred for Mayweather, only opinions of his recent ring work. Right now, I’m not impressed with him. That’s all. There’s no agenda against him or bias towards him. If you think he’s the best fighter in the world, good for you. If you think he’s the best fighter who ever lived, I’m happy for you. If you think I have some kind of personal problem with him, you’re wrong, but you have every right to think that I hate him and you are more than welcome to let me know this.
All I ask is that you realize that from my perspective, you are no different from any other fan of elite fighters whose primes preceded Mayweather’s. Oscar De La Hoya had his Golden Boys. Roy Jones had his Roy Boys. Mayweather has his Pretty Boys. I know you think your guy is the best in the business, and maybe you are right, but you dudes are no different than the fanatics who jumped my ass for criticizing De La Hoya, Jones, Felix Trinidad, the Klitschkos and many other stars who have come and gone. No matter how awesome you think your guy is, the time will come that he will be brought down to earth, and when that happens, I know that I won’t be bothered with your frustrated emails any longer.
I know, I know, you think Mayweather’s unbeatable. He’ll wipe his pretty little butt with every top dog from 140 to 154 pounds. I know you really believe this, so I’m not mad at you. I’m mad at Mayweather because he’s the one who is supposed to believe this. However his actions (or non-action) over the past three years tell me otherwise.
Your emails:
DOUGIE’S A STRAIGHT UP HATER
man are you biased. your a straight up hater. that is all i have to say, thank you. – Lam Vo
You’re wrong, but thanks for keeping it short.
NOT FAIR TO MAYWEATHER
Ok Ok yes Mayweather is fighting opponents without a chance in hell to win, however he is getting much too much flak for not fighting better opposition. Not once have I seen any criticism of other 140lb fighters. It always Mayweather vs this one or that one. How about asking when is Cotto going to fight Mayweather rather than the other way around. How bout Hatton v Cotto, or Cotto v Tszyu or Hatton v Witter. How bout getting on Judah for not fighting Magarito, or Margarito for not fighting Judah. My point is only Mayweather is getting flak for not having a big fight, and none of the other 140-147 fighters are. I agree Magarito-Mayweather would be a very interesting fight, however wouldn’t Judah-Margarito be just as entertaining.
Am I wrong? Is the criticism of Mayweather warranted? If so why not of Hatton, Cotton and Judah. Just want to know your thoughts – Russell
When you call out Winky Wright and Oscar De La Hoya and threaten to fight them at 154 pounds but are not willing to fight Antonio Margarito for $7 million at 147 pounds you are going to get some criticism – at least from me. I’m not going to expect the same things from Cotto and Hatton that I expect from Mayweather because A) they haven’t been on the world-class scene since 1998 like PBF, and B) they don’t claim to be the best fighter in the world, pound for pound, the way your boy does.
Mayweather is not getting flak for not having “a big fight” this year. He had a big fight, the Arturo Gatti blowout. He’s getting flak for not having a COMPETITIVE fight in the last THREE years, and for not doing his part to get in the ring with the fighters he knows will bring the heat. There’s a difference.
WHAT’S YOUR PROBLEM WITH MAYWEATHER?
You say that the Mayweather bout was not really a welterweight bout because Mitchell was not a "real" welterweight, well, one of your loves, Erik Morales, fought a guy named Zahir Raheem in his first "lightweight" bout and if I remember correctly, Raheem was a featherweight. I don't "get" all the problems with Mayweather. Mitchell, before he got blown out by Kostya Tsyzu, was thought of as being a real threat to Kostya. He is a slick southpaw, also. And, I think it's great to watch the talent of the pretty boy.
You had Erik Morales up on the P4P list for beating Jesus Chavez and Carlos Hernandez but wait... Mayweather already beat them. How 'bout the fight of the decade?... Jose Luis Castillo vs Chico... wait... Mayweather already beat both of them!
Give Mayweather some credit.. he's the best boxer on the planet, and if you don't find it fun to watch his skill level, then that's your problem, but, I make sure I watch all of his fights, he's incredible to watch. And Tony Margarito? The guy lost to a southpaw that isn't really even that good in Daniel Santos, and has been 2-1 in his last 3 fights. You really think that pretty boy is scared of him? Gimme a break. Thats' all. Peace – Bob
Mayweather’s action (or non-action in Margarito’s case) speak a lot louder than your words, Bob. Like I told Jay from Florida in this week’s Monday Mail Bag, if you think Margarito will get beat by Mayweather because he lost a close technical decision to a 6-foot-1 junior middleweight who has punching power then you don’t understand that styles make fights or that size definitely matters in boxing. Not only would Margarito give Mayweather hell, so would Santos!
Before I get to my “love”, Erik Morales, I should note that his fans used to hound me about not ranking him higher in my pound-for-pound list. They hated that I rated Barrera, who didn’t look so hot in their rematch, so far above him. (This was in mid-2003, before Barrera was KTFO by PacMan, and before Morales stepped up to 130 pounds.) However, after ’04 and the first quarter of this year, I believe I elevated El Terrible to where he belongs, top five pound-for-pound, based on his victories over Jesus Chavez and Carlos Hernandez, and the close and competitive 24 rounds he battled with Barrera and Pacquiao. (He has since fallen from the top five due to his loss to Raheem, who by the way had been fighting at lightweight before he fought El Terrible, but not out of the top 10; I give the man credit for taking on a young contender with a difficult style – when is the last time Mayweather has done that?)
I’m well aware that Mayweather beat Chavez and Hernandez back in 2001. Mayweather was the no. 1 junior lightweight in ’01; in fact, that year I ranked him no. 5 among the best the 130-pound fighters of all time (behind only Alexis Arguello, Sandy Saddler, Julio Cesar Chavez and Azumah Nelson).
However, I give more credit for recent accomplishments in my pound-for-pound list, and personally, I think Morales’ victories over Chavez and Hernandez were more impressive than the Pretty Boy’s. Why? Two reasons: 1) They held world titles when Morales fought them, thus Terrible unified two major belts (something Mayweather has never accomplished), and 2) Morales is a natural 122 pounder who beat two natural 130 pounders (and, in my opinion, more mature and confident versions of Chavez and Hernandez than Mayweather faced).
Regarding Corrales-Castillo I, why should Mayweather get any credit for the blood, sweat and tears THEY shed in the ring this past May? I give Mayweather credit for beating the January of 2001 version of Corrales. I give him credit for edging out the 2002 version of Castillo. Anything Corrales or Castillo has accomplished in the ring since ’01 and ’02, the credit goes to them, not Mayweather. (I don’t see anybody retroactively giving Javier Jauregui credit for what Castillo has accomplished since he twice stopped the Sonora mauler.)
Comment