Bradley walk around weight 160 lbs, Pac 155lbs.
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I am sure the "skill wins fights" applies to Pac defeating Cotto but the point was WHY A CATCH WEIGHT? If you want to challenge the champion for his title then fight him at his weight.
Comment
-
PAC doesn't even make 147. I am sure he walks at 150 and not 155.
PAC eats in the morning making 147, he doesn't look toned as back in the days.Comment
-
just bcuz a fighter walks around heavier than his oponent doesnt mean hes the naturally bigger man, to make the assumption that he is is dumb. i guess ricky hatton is a naturally bigger man than bernard hopkins by your logic. besides a 5lb diffrence when it comes to walking around weight really isnt anything at these weights.We all know Pac's walk around weight is 150-155. Bradley is 160.
Just means Bradley is a naturally bigger fighter than pac.
Bradley is a natural welterweight fighter fighting at light welter-weight. He should definitely be stronger and at his best at welter-weight.
Bradley is younger, undefeated, motivated, a real threat.
This is a good match can't wait.
link: http://www.boxingscene.com/tim-bradl...g-night--49633
bradley is by no means a natural WW, he arguably isnt even a real 140lber, you could argue hes more of a lgihtweight than anything. his body frame is pretty small for 140, thats mainly what you look at when you judge someones natural size. walk around weight proves nothing, you never know how close to their fighting shape a fighter is at between fights.Comment
-
Duh.. ok! Go be fan of Floyd. No problem their. I won't waste my time explaining to you what this thread is all about. This is not a Floyd thread. Go somewhere else and ride Floyd's divk in another thread
Comment
-
If you think bloated and fat means you are the naturally bigger guy then you are ******. Hatton was fat and bloated.just bcuz a fighter walks around heavier than his oponent doesnt mean hes the naturally bigger man, to make the assumption that he is is dumb. i guess ricky hatton is a naturally bigger man than bernard hopkins by your logic. besides a 5lb diffrence when it comes to walking around weight really isnt anything at these weights.
bradley is by no means a natural WW, he arguably isnt even a real 140lber, you could argue hes more of a lgihtweight than anything. his body frame is pretty small for 140, thats mainly what you look at when you judge someones natural size. walk around weight proves nothing, you never know how close to their fighting shape a fighter is at between fights.
Bradley is ripped and has low body fat when he carries his walk around weight.
That's were you know that's his real natural weight. When he still looks fit and ripped. Bradley even looks ripper than Pac.
Fitness level at the walk around will tell what's the real deal.
Anybody can be fat. That's not a healthy walk around weight. We're talking about fit muscle walk around weight. And we all know bradley is a fit fighter like pac. They are both lean.
Bradley walks around 160. Pac 155.
To close just saying they are close in size much so for Bradley. I feel he is the bigger guy. Just seeing his ripped frame and muscle mass shows who is bigger than the 2. But very minimal size difference.Last edited by Spoon23; 02-17-2012, 06:04 AM.Comment
-
If that is the case then 150 pac walk around weight vs a lean bradley with a walk around weight of 160 means = Bradley is the bigger guy.
For those who don't know what a walk around weight means. This is the weight they naturally walk everyday, therefore their real weight.Comment
Comment