Simple question worth asking as champs face most likely their biggest challenge (although debatable as to who was a bigger challenge to Cotto, Pac/May, not the discussion though).
Anyways, both PR fighters at this current juncture and the past juncture fought arguably their biggest challenge, so who was facing a bigger challenge?
Cotto v. Mayweather will pit, while both are a little past prime, Mayweather is arguably this generation's best (ironically, paired against Hopkins) and most complete boxer. Cotto is a great fighter who's been through the wringer and will undoubtedly come into the fight a bit less fresher. Mayweather is moving up, although he has reach and height advantages, I don't think the weight is a factor overall, especially considering how big a weight advantage Ortiz had. Cotto has alot of technical disadvantages coming into the fight.
or
Tito v. Hopkins. This fight was a move up in weight class for Tito against a then, budding great fighter, who even at 35 might not have hit his overall prime, arguably. Tito was fighting the MW champ and had impeccable power, albeit at the lower weights. I think in overall frame, they were about equals, but Hopkins holding the customary advantage of being dominant in that class. Tito had alot of technical disadvantages going into that fight, even if he was favored.
So, seeing how both fights are somewhat similar in juxtaposition, who is going to, or has faced a bigger challenge when presented with their biggest career fight, Tito or Cotto?
Discuss
Anyways, both PR fighters at this current juncture and the past juncture fought arguably their biggest challenge, so who was facing a bigger challenge?
Cotto v. Mayweather will pit, while both are a little past prime, Mayweather is arguably this generation's best (ironically, paired against Hopkins) and most complete boxer. Cotto is a great fighter who's been through the wringer and will undoubtedly come into the fight a bit less fresher. Mayweather is moving up, although he has reach and height advantages, I don't think the weight is a factor overall, especially considering how big a weight advantage Ortiz had. Cotto has alot of technical disadvantages coming into the fight.
or
Tito v. Hopkins. This fight was a move up in weight class for Tito against a then, budding great fighter, who even at 35 might not have hit his overall prime, arguably. Tito was fighting the MW champ and had impeccable power, albeit at the lower weights. I think in overall frame, they were about equals, but Hopkins holding the customary advantage of being dominant in that class. Tito had alot of technical disadvantages going into that fight, even if he was favored.
So, seeing how both fights are somewhat similar in juxtaposition, who is going to, or has faced a bigger challenge when presented with their biggest career fight, Tito or Cotto?
Discuss
Comment