FM jr still blowing guys out

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jack Napier
    Whores on Our Cul de Sac
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8668
    • 812
    • 424
    • 16,030

    #11
    Originally posted by -Kev-
    The JMM win meant nothing, until 2 years later at the same weight class, JMM beat the supposed Fighter of the Decade, #1 welterweight, and #1 P4P fighter in the world. The JMM win for Floyd all of a sudden inflated thanks to how horrible Pac managed to look against a 2 year older JMM and obvious cherrypick.
    JMM didn't win, he did better than he was supposed to
    Pac isn't a WW, people who didn't know that found out in Pac-JMM 3
    that win still means shit for Floyd's resume
    you're one of the few likable/sensible Floyd fans, don't go this route dude

    Comment

    • Phenom
      Phenomdeaux
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 12218
      • 494
      • 363
      • 101,474

      #12
      Originally posted by Jack Napier
      Pac isn't a WW, people who didn't know that found out in Pac-JMM 3
      that win still means shit for Floyd's resume
      you're one of the few likable/sensible Floyd fans, don't go this route dude
      why is he fighting LW and JrWW at welterweight

      Comment

      • Jack Napier
        Whores on Our Cul de Sac
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 8668
        • 812
        • 424
        • 16,030

        #13
        Originally posted by Phenom
        why is he fighting LW and JrWW at welterweight
        because he's getting paid bigger money since he moved up
        it's not rocket science
        he can fight at WW, but physically, he's not a WW
        keep this a Floyd thread, don't make it a Pac thread

        Comment

        • gatagata
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2009
          • 2399
          • 92
          • 79
          • 9,199

          #14
          Originally posted by -Kev-
          When you talk about close fights, you mention Mayweather-Castillo, Marquez-Pacquiao I, Froch-Pascal, Hopkins-Taylor, Wright-Taylor, Williams-Martinez I, Mosley-Cotto, etc.

          Marquez-Pacquiao III was not close, it was a robbery. People who are against calling fights robbery so easily, called this fight a robbery and a stain on the sport and why "they don't like boxing anymore".
          That fight wasn't close. Why are people saying that fight was close?

          Comment

          • sugersean15
            The king of Boxing Scene
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2011
            • 3392
            • 279
            • 146
            • 10,100

            #15
            Mayweather #1 enough said

            Comment

            • cupocity303
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2005
              • 9604
              • 752
              • 750
              • 22,038

              #16
              Personally, i'd like to see some arguments being made for why Floyd is still blowing guys out, VS why he is a straight heterosexual with picture of him and females being posted as Exhibit A.

              i know it's coming.

              Comment

              • Walt Liquor
                the opposite of pure
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 21667
                • 913
                • 1,369
                • 40,313

                #17
                you people are disgutsting...


                I would never....

                but for real, he does blow out all the good fighters he faces and its not even close. wish he had some better contemporaries so we could see if someone could take him down.

                Comment

                • Bushbaby
                  Wild Apache
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 23513
                  • 727
                  • 370
                  • 32,078

                  #18
                  Yah, the Marquez win for Floyd had no credibility, until Pacman got his a$$ kicked by an older version. LOL!!

                  Comment

                  • Walt Liquor
                    the opposite of pure
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 21667
                    • 913
                    • 1,369
                    • 40,313

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Bushbaby
                    Yah, the Marquez win for Floyd had no credibility, until Pacman got his a$$ kicked by an older version. LOL!!
                    it was really pretty bad. pac completely fought the wrong fight, but i thought he won by a **** hair.

                    Comment

                    • jaestix1
                      Banned
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 1735
                      • 92
                      • 2
                      • 1,882

                      #20
                      lol at *******s discrediting the jmm win for floyd. you dumb ***g0ts fail to realize you only have two choices:

                      1. admit that poochiao is an overrated hypejob that let a 40 year old lw take him to school.

                      2. admit that floyd beat a legit fighter and deserves credit for beating a top #2 p4p fighter coming off a two year layoff.
                      Last edited by jaestix1; 02-07-2012, 07:18 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP