So what exactly does Bradley have to do to beat Pacquiao?

[The Gambler1981]

Make it an ugly boring fight, that is tough to decpiher and hope he gets the benefit of the doubt which is unlikely but who knows.

Bradley is a good boxer but he can't freeze out Manny on the outside, and from far out he throws some terrible looking punches which will likely cost him agianst Manny, plus Manny will throw more punches thus giving him a clear edge in that scenario.

If he opens up and tries to match Manny blow for blow, he certainly isn't winning that way.

So that leaves him with dragging the fight into the mud which he is adept at, that should throw off Manny a bit and mitigate his offense plus it gives Bradley a bit of free reign with his inside game. If Manny can create space though this plan will fall apart because the nice looking punches will belong to Manny when he gets that space even if it is only a small percent of the time those moments will be very clear while the rest of the fight will be muddled.

[PACsmash]

In the other thread you commented its wrong for judges to come into a fight favoring one fighter over the other. I think its clear Bob will have judges and a referee that wont cheat but will be "manny friendly"

I don't see how Bradley wins. I don't think he gets the fight if there is a good chance he wins.

I don't think the judges were manny friendly, like I said beat pac decisively and u'll win. Don't cry about it after.If u wanna talk about bad judges take the khan Peterson fight for an example, but since khan fights for roach and so does manny u will see it different.

[Bushbaby]

I don't think the judges were manny friendly, like I said beat pac decisively and u'll win. Don't cry about it after.If u wanna talk about bad judges take the khan Peterson fight for an example, but since khan fights for roach and so does manny u will see it different.

I guess you were not aware than Khan lost 2 points in that fight right??

[PACsmash]

I guess you were not aware than Khan lost 2 points in that fight right??

I guess I left out judges and ref friendly.

[Jack Napier]

he has to swarm
Bradley better be prepared to work 3 min every single rd
he's stronger than Pac, but he's not a hard puncher
body work is crucial for Bradley
he needs to cut off the ring and put Pac on the ropes if he can
uppercuts can do damage for Bradley up close

[The Big Dunn]

I don't think the judges were manny friendly, like I said beat pac decisively and u'll win. Don't cry about it after.If u wanna talk about bad judges take the khan Peterson fight for an example, but since khan fights for roach and so does manny u will see it different.

The judges were Bob friendly. MAnny winning is good for bob. ergo, the judges are "manny friendly".

And you best believe if Bob thinks he has someone who will outsell manny, those judges will be "bob friendly" too.

[PACsmash]

The judges were Bob friendly. MAnny winning is good for bob. ergo, the judges are "manny friendly".

And you best believe if Bob thinks he has someone who will outsell manny, those judges will be "bob friendly" too.

Yup Marquez knock manny down 6 times on top of that Marquez won 11 out of the 12 rounds and the judges still gave it to pacman.... The fuuukkk outta here with that crap.

[D4thincarnation]

The judges were Bob friendly. MAnny winning is good for bob. ergo, the judges are "manny friendly".

And you best believe if Bob thinks he has someone who will outsell manny, those judges will be "bob friendly" too.

Vegas judges favour aggression, well they do in all but 1 fight Mayweather vs Castillo.

Don't know what happened there.

[Takuramombe]

good fight,I've Bradley winning here

[PACsmash]

Big dumb so I guess there's no point in a PAC vs Floyd match because Floyd won't be able to knock manny out and the judges are manny friendly or in ur words bob friendly, so Floyd can't win based on ur logic?