Let's face it Mayweather/Cotto should have happened years ago. Since that time Pacquiao dominated and then destroyed him over 12 rounds in a fight where Cotto basically ran. Was the damage of 3 long years ago enough to make Cotto meet the requirements of what Floyd Mayweather describes as a "leftover"?
Did Pacquiao damage Cotto enough to make him PRE-DAMAGED GOODS against Floyd?
Collapse
-
The fact is, Mayweather discredited Pacquiao's win over Cotto due to being "beaten with a cast" by Margarito.
According to Floyd's logic, we should now add to Cotto's list being beaten from pillar to post by Pacquiao. Using Floyd's own standard, a victory over Cotto is not worthy of credit.
Of course, I think Floyd's opinion on most things is pure ****. Cotto is a good fighter, but his best days are behind him and so are Floyd's- too bad this fight didn't happen in 2008. Floyd retired for the first time instead.Comment
-
If you say so...
*****s: Cotto is a shot... pac/cotto 2 is a waste of time...
*****s: Pac is fighting floyds leftovers
Floyd: I will fight cotto on may 5!
*****s: The fight of the century! This is it!
hahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
the worst fans in the century!Comment
-
You sure do love to exaggerate. Just stop, you're embarrassing yourselfComment
-
Comment
-
Let's face it Mayweather/Cotto should have happened years ago. Since that time Pacquiao dominated and then destroyed him over 12 rounds in a fight where Cotto basically ran. Was the damage of 3 long years ago enough to make Cotto meet the requirements of what Floyd Mayweather describes as a "leftover"?
Comment

Comment