I cant watch the video now can someone tell me how Dwyer compared Alexander and Pac. I wanna laugh.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dwyer Likes Bradley Over Pac. Says Pac Is Like Devon
Collapse
-
-
if pac isnt fighting floyd then bradley is the next best thing IMO.
He's undefeated, young, top 10 p4p, and most important of all he's BLACK.
Comment
-
What Dwyer says about Bradley and Pacquiao's inside fighting is correct. Bradley is a better inside fighter than Pacquiao and he has good footwork and footspeed. Pacquiao is a better inside fighter than Devon (on offense and defense).
I don't think Bradley wins against Pacquiao though.
If I thought Bradley had the accuracy and compactedness in his counterpunches, I could see him winning a decision because he'd be able to trap Pacquiao, provoke his attack, and counter. He could also trap Pacquiao and let his combinations go on him.
The problem lies in Bradley trapping Pacquiao and being too tentative in attacking. Devon had him tentative before his attack and almost stole the fight after 10 because of his activity.
I see Pacquiao winning rounds on workrate alone. If I were to bet, I'd bet on Pacquiao by decision or on the over/under points handicap.
Comment
-
Originally posted by welcometosaigon View PostI don't think Tim "headbutt storm" Bradley has shown anything against his B level opponents that should make anyone think he has a chance against Pacquiao. Manny wins this fight easy IMO.
Marquez struggled against B level opponents at 135, Casamayor,Juan Diaz, Kastidis who floored him and then he fought a "could have gone either" with Pac...
We just don't know if Timmy is smart and tough enough to execute a great game plan like JMM did and take Manny's punches but it might be the case.
Timmy has beaten Alexander and Peterson easy, he has proven he's a very good fighter, I think he's a tough willy guy...Souldn't be overlooked.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bluetech View Postif pac isnt fighting floyd then bradley is the next best thing IMO.
He's undefeated, young, top 10 p4p, and most important of all he's BLACK.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wizard king View Postyou know nothing about gambling.dwyer makes money or breakes even,reguradless which fighter he picks to wins or lose.its called a straddle.you mat not agree with his points but atleast he makes a solid case for which fighter he thinks would win not like the many clowns on this site.
No he can't possible breakeven or make money regardless, because it is mathematically impossible. You can say that he hedge his risks but hes still most likely losing expected value by doing so.
Yes he makes a case, but it's horribly misinformed. Him saying Bradley is the favorite here (as he hints at not even mentioning the odds) is like saying microsoft should be valued at three times the price it's currently at on the stock market.
In the end both sports-betting and the stock market works the same. In order to beat it you need to apply info that hasn't already been accounted for, IE making better simulations than the bookie and other sharps. Or you have to shop the line and anticipate the movement.
If you think Dwyer has some special system to beat sports-betting with his straddles you are absolutely clueless. Maybe you should try to martingale the roulette tables while you're at it?
Comment
-
That's exactly who Pacquiao should be fighting if not Mayweather, much respect if he goes that route, very dangerous opponent too.
Comment
Comment