Which fight would u rather watch? I dont understand why Showtime is against Froch Bute which would be a very interesting fight.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bute Froch or Bute Dirrell?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
dirrell is a free agent now which means he's gonna hang around fighting bums until a baldomir type scores an upset over a top fighter then he will pounce on him and claim supremacy. "i beat baldomir type guy who beat elite guy therefore i am better" works every time.
Comment
-
froch would probably be a better fight
dirrel could actually handle the speed and land some shots of his own, though
i'd like to see froch simply to watch him continue his run of the roughest opponents in boxing
but i do think dirrell has a better chance. he's very talented. i still think he loses by knockout, but he's fast enough to actually compete for afew rounds
froch will get whitewashed by bute, but he's not goign to shy away the first time he tastes the power
or get dropped
andre dirrell would keep you on the edge of your seat because of the potential to get his chin brokenLast edited by New England; 01-28-2012, 12:01 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ny123 View PostI agree both are good fights but Showtime being so against Froch Bute doesn't make any sense.
i dont blame them for not wanting to use huge amounts of their budget on a single bute fight when they can get a simmilar result pairing him with somebody who doesnt command carl froch money
unless his name is andre ward..Last edited by New England; 01-28-2012, 11:59 AM.
Comment
Comment