Why not 60/40 to the winner?

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • viewsat
    Contender
    • Jun 2009
    • 279
    • 9
    • 8
    • 6,455
    #1

    Why not 60/40 to the winner?

    60/40 to the winner is very fair since both fighters think they can win easily...
    Tags: 60/40, winner?
    • Nice Try
      Banned
      • Jan 2012
      • 39
      • 4
      • 3
      • 70
      #2
      it would depend on his promoter, bob arum

        Comment

        • DLT
          DMV
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Nov 2004
          • 17087
          • 737
          • 35
          • 24,277
          #3
          nobody likes to do that. What if one guy clearly won but got robbed? You also get a bunch of people to pay and so on. Its just a headache and its not reality

            Comment

            • sugersean15
              The king of Boxing Scene
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jun 2011
              • 3392
              • 279
              • 146
              • 10,100
              #4
              what about if mayweather wins he gets 60/40 if pac wins he gets 50/5o sounds fair

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...
                TOP

                Sign In

                Forgot password?

                Register

                Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
                JOIN NOW