The problem is, what makes Haye a good win as a heavyweight?
Haye could be a good win if he had a better resume at heavyweight. He only beat Valuev and shot Ruiz basically.
I do think many probably overrate Tysons greatness (maybe some boxing snobs underrate him, but the majority of fans overrate it) and underrate Wlads. But i still think Tyson is greater due to having better wins overall.
Better than Vitalis,who has a paper thin resume,its closer between him and Wlad though,i think the way Tyson beat people and his achievements give him the edge
The problem is, what makes Haye a good win as a heavyweight?
Haye could be a good win if he had a better resume at heavyweight. He only beat Valuev and shot Ruiz basically.
I do think many probably overrate Tysons greatness (maybe some boxing snobs underrate him, but the majority of fans overrate it) and underrate Wlads. But i still think Tyson is greater due to having better wins overall.
I count the danger of an opponent for a lot when ranking a resume. Lots were picking Haye to stop Wlad like Sanders did.
Comment