Peterson-Khan was a close fight but not a bad decision like the other two. They were robberies.
Worst Robbery: Lara/Williams, Khan/Peterson, Chisora/Helenius?
Collapse
-
khan-peterson was by no means a robbery. peterson was the better man, he deserved to get the decision so the judges got it right. khan was lucky he didnt get DQ'ed, he deserved those two point deductions and he got a free point in round 1 for a knockdown that wasnt really a knockdown. so the ref, although he did a poor job didnt favor peterson like alot ppl seem to think (bcuz hbo said so).
lara deserved the decison imo, but i had him winning by just 2 points. bad decision yes, but not really a robbery either imo.
chisora-helenius, now thats a robbery. chisora won atleast 10 rounds of that fight, and he won them big too. the fight was completely one sided and they give it to the wrong guy, thats highway robbery.Comment
-
-
well said mankhan-peterson was by no means a robbery. peterson was the better man, he deserved to get the decision so the judges got it right. khan was lucky he didnt get DQ'ed, he deserved those two point deductions and he got a free point in round 1 for a knockdown that wasnt really a knockdown. so the ref, although he did a poor job didnt favor peterson like alot ppl seem to think (bcuz hbo said so).
lara deserved the decison imo, but i had him winning by just 2 points. bad decision yes, but not really a robbery either imo.
chisora-helenius, now thats a robbery. chisora won atleast 10 rounds of that fight, and he won them big too. the fight was completely one sided and they give it to the wrong guy, thats highway robbery.
although i would class the lara fight as a robbery it was so clear whose punches were doing the most damageComment
Comment