The thing that i absolutely love about this forum, the thing that seperates this forum from all the others i have read is, 90% of the posters who react to a new thread have not even bothered to read the original post. I had noticed this yesterday in the thread where the allegations were made and it took up to page 10(iirc) untill a mod pointed out actually what was said and then the people on this forum thought ''oh ok maybe Khan does have a point''. There was a few who bothered to read the original post and therefore knew that Khan was well within his rights to want answers. Again in this thread, i reckon 5% have actually bothered to listen to what Schaefer has said, the rest of the 95% have just continued to let blind hate dominate there thoughts ahead of justice in boxing. Not justice that Khan should have got the win, justice as in let's at least get the facts together and be able to say it was a fair fight.
Now yes this guy was a IBF official, but HE HAD NO RIGHT TO BE THERE. He was not sanctioned by the IBF to be at that fight so why was he there? I'd particluarly like ''IronDanHamza'' to answer me this question who im guessing by his username is of asian descent? Am i right? If i am wrong i apologise. I know this will not be liked but it has to be said, a big chunk NOT ALL of the hate for Khan is because he is A) British and B) ******. Either one of those on it's own is bad enough for many on here but when you have a successfull world famous pro boxer who combines the two! Goddamn! It causes some people to burn so much they literally have smoke beaming out from their posts.
Now dont get me wrong, his reaction to his loss has been disgracefull imo. It will have made him a whole bunch of new haters fairly imo as no boxing fan likes to see a pro boxer react to a defeat like that. We know that Boxers will always have their standard set of haters however with Khan it has always been different. He has had to endure a whole different set of haters from the off because of who he is, and to top it off he has had it the worst in his home country. To be fair to America, he has had it much better over there than he has here. However internet forums tend to bring together all sorts of saddos and it a heaven for haters so he gets some serious hate on here and has done long before this Peterson saga. Why? Because he's a overrated ****y prick? Maybe parts of the abuse directed at him could be justified because of that but no way is that the sole reason. Believe what you want but the root cause is that he is a ******. Being a ****** in todays world is like being black in the 20th century, not a very good thing to be in the eyes of the masses.
" we are going to continue our investigative work here..... because you know what they say, where there is smoke there is fire..... this is astonishing and shocking..... we need to get to the bottom of this..... this man was not present in any official capacity, he should not have been there, and he should not have been handling the individual per-wound scorecards "
This is exactly the information that we needed, and this is exactly what should happen.
a.) held no official capacity at that fight
2.) inappropriately communicated with the fight supervisor
3.) inappropriately communicated with the judges
4.) inappropriately handled the official scorecards
5.) inappropriately celebrated with Team Peterson after the fight
Just wow
Ummm..... btw, did I remember to mention the word " inappropriate " ?
" we are going to continue our investigative work here..... because you know what they say, where there is smoke there is fire..... this is astonishing and shocking..... we need to get to the bottom of this..... this man was not present in any official capacity, he should not have been there, and he should not have been handling the individual per-wound scorecards "
This is exactly the information that we needed, and this is exactly what should happen.
Comment