Comments Thread For: Khan Questions Mystery Man, Score Tampering is Loss

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NoLove
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2011
    • 1262
    • 55
    • 56
    • 7,781

    #141
    Originally posted by hougigo
    sounds legit, jk
    But seriously, not everyone rewatchez a fight 100 times in slow mo looking for a
    A reason to scrutinize
    Exactly. There's a mystery man everywhere you look if you want there to be.

    Comment

    • typeone
      Tell's It How It Is......
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2005
      • 1549
      • 60
      • 30
      • 8,052

      #142
      The truth is Khan lost the fight through know thought of his own...

      Period

      Comment

      • TheKza
        Prince Of Shiet
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 4195
        • 707
        • 1,035
        • 12,188

        #143
        "The president of the World Boxing Association Gilberto Jesus Mendoza says the unidentified man accused by Amir Khan of interfering with the judges during his defeat to Lamont Peterson last month is "unknown" to the organisation."

        "More from Mendoza: "The [Washington DC] Commission did not behave properly in this fight in seeking the fairness that needed to be [there]."

        "According to WBA president Gilberto Jesus Mendoza: "There should be a direct re-match of this fight [Khan v Peterson]"

        BBC, Sport, BBC Sport, bbc.co.uk, world, uk, international, foreign, british, online, service

        Comment

        • sapaw
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2009
          • 1049
          • 34
          • 21
          • 7,537

          #144
          Originally posted by TheKza
          "The president of the World Boxing Association Gilberto Jesus Mendoza says the unidentified man accused by Amir Khan of interfering with the judges during his defeat to Lamont Peterson last month is "unknown" to the organisation."

          "More from Mendoza: "The [Washington DC] Commission did not behave properly in this fight in seeking the fairness that needed to be [there]."

          "According to WBA president Gilberto Jesus Mendoza: "There should be a direct re-match of this fight [Khan v Peterson]"

          http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/front_page/9672316.stm
          wow, now this is more getting fishy. I hate khan but as a boxing fan, Khan should be given a rematch because of this Mystery Man.

          Comment

          • flat1985
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 3623
            • 79
            • 59
            • 12,950

            #145
            Richard Schafer just said on SSN that the bloke worked for the IBF BUT he was not ment to be at that fight wtf??

            Comment

            • Makaaveli
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 172
              • 7
              • 1
              • 6,360

              #146
              Lmaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooo

              Comment

              • LeadUppercut
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2010
                • 13387
                • 305
                • 869
                • 13,720

                #147
                Originally posted by DempseyRollin
                if the man works for one of the title organizations its easy to understadnd why he would be talking to walsh. i mean seriously, there are numerous possibilities before you jump to conspiracy. the guy was obviously someone of promary importance. he wouldnt be seated where he was otherwise. that seating is reserved for fight supervisors.
                WHOAH !!

                No fkn way.

                1.) That seating is reserved for officials ONLY, so why did that guy need to drag a seat up at the start of the second round. If the guy was an authorized official, why wasn't a seat provided for him right at the start of the fight?

                2.) The guy was not a member of the WBA/IBF, that has been confirmed

                3.) Who fkn cares who he was, it is absolutely inappropriate to talk to the fight supervisor during the fight, and it is completely unacceptable for anyone to talk to the judges

                4.) It is also completely unacceptable for anyone to handle the scorecards

                5.) You say that the guy was obviously someone of "primary importance"..... but if that was true, then everyone would know who that guy was, but nobody does..... nobody can even name him, let alone state his order of business

                Come on bro, something aint right there.

                I dont give a **** about Khan's title, hard luck for him, he lost in the ring imho..... but something aint right about this.

                I take your point, as it is a very good point, there are far too many knee-jerk reactions on this site..... but if it correct for you to advise that folks should not jump to conclusions, then it is just as correct for me to say "hold on, this doesn't sound right, lets NOT just sweep it under the carpet and pretend it never happened".

                Comment

                • LeadUppercut
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2010
                  • 13387
                  • 305
                  • 869
                  • 13,720

                  #148
                  Originally posted by NoLove
                  So they think mystery man corrupted the score cards in the seat directly in front of Khans promoter, De La Hoya and his father. Not likely.

                  If you watch any top fight close enough you will see this kind of thing.
                  Show me one example.

                  Just one.

                  Comment

                  • LeadUppercut
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 13387
                    • 305
                    • 869
                    • 13,720

                    #149
                    Originally posted by Makaaveli
                    You mean this - http://lockerz.com/s/172065810

                    Dodgy **** :blow:
                    Ummm..... is that the same guy ?

                    Really

                    Comment

                    • LeadUppercut
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2010
                      • 13387
                      • 305
                      • 869
                      • 13,720

                      #150
                      Originally posted by locke
                      yes this:



                      something seriously wrong there..
                      wtf ????????????

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP