Did you see Taylor taunting Hopkins today??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CHICO_4LIFE
    corazon y orgullo.
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Sep 2005
    • 475
    • 24
    • 6
    • 6,763

    #21
    Originally posted by Super_Lightweight
    I have no ill will against you, but this is the comment of someone who hasn't watched boxing for very long. I merely made an observation. This was not a controversial decision.

    Mosely-DLH II is controversial.

    Byrd-Oquendo...controversial.

    Briggs-Foreman...controversial.

    Watch these fights and learn what controversy REALLY is.

    fair enough..

    Comment

    • AintGottaClue
      What for that be
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2004
      • 6204
      • 221
      • 92
      • 12,939

      #22
      most fight fans feel that taylor one the fight? really? i say most fans are split really.

      Comment

      • strongisland24
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Feb 2005
        • 418
        • 12
        • 1
        • 6,716

        #23
        taylor is the man and will win if he fights up to his full ability. i lost all respect for hopkins after that cancer **** he said. he's a heartless thug. taylor is a classact. i hate people saying oh taylor has no respect. he did but hopkins is just an awuful person.

        Comment

        • scap
          Boxingscene's *****
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2004
          • 7226
          • 385
          • 1
          • 17,023

          #24
          Taylor got the nod in the first fight...


          Everyone acted like he needed to apologize for getting the decision and giving Nard his toughest scrap in over a decade....


          So...


          Taylor needs to stand up for himslef and Im glad he is doing it, so alot of exerts think Nard deserved the nod...so...should Taylor apologize and kiss Nards ass...

          Taylor is a warrior and I got news for a lot of you new Hopkins watchers...he aint coming out after Jermain...what you saw in the last fight from Hopkins is what your gonna see in the rematch...he has been fighting the same type of fight since Trinidad.




          Taylor is the one that will come into the ring a new and improved fighter...If Bernard couldnt KO him in rounds 10/12 in the last fight he is not going to KO him in this fight.

          Comment

          • restless_438
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2004
            • 3878
            • 185
            • 145
            • 10,425

            #25
            yeah... whoever said most fans think Taylor won must be confused.. anyway, glad to see Taylor seeming to take this whole situation so lightly, to bad Hopkins knows he can take anything Taylor throws at him and is searing with confidence. it'll make for a more clear win this time around. If Taylor does plan on winning again, he better change something cause i guarentee Bernard "The Executioner" Hopkins isn't playing around with his legacy come December 3rd.

            btw, here's a pic, didn't see it posted yet:

            Last edited by restless_438; 11-15-2005, 10:45 PM.

            Comment

            • AintGottaClue
              What for that be
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Dec 2004
              • 6204
              • 221
              • 92
              • 12,939

              #26
              Originally posted by scap
              Taylor got the nod in the first fight...


              Everyone acted like he needed to apologize for getting the decision and giving Nard his toughest scrap in over a decade....


              So...


              Taylor needs to stand up for himslef and Im glad he is doing it, so alot of exerts think Nard deserved the nod...so...should Taylor apologize and kiss Nards ass...

              Taylor is a warrior and I got news for a lot of you new Hopkins watchers...he aint coming out after Jermain...what you saw in the last fight from Hopkins is what your gonna see in the rematch...he has been fighting the same type of fight since Trinidad.




              Taylor is the one that will come into the ring a new and improved fighter...If Bernard couldnt KO him in rounds 10/12 in the last fight he is not going to KO him in this fight.
              why cant he? besides, look how hard it was for taylor to "win" agaisnt a 40 year old man, a younger nard would KO'd him like tito in the 12th but he could still do it now, taylor is not even better then a faded hopkins

              Comment

              • scap
                Boxingscene's *****
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2004
                • 7226
                • 385
                • 1
                • 17,023

                #27
                Originally posted by SturmRules
                why cant he? besides, look how hard it was for taylor to "win" agaisnt a 40 year old man, a younger nard would KO'd him like tito in the 12th but he could still do it now, taylor is not even better then a faded hopkins

                Nard is all of a sudden faded?

                This is a bad post Sturm...I got news for you Bernard is a much better fighter at 40 then he was at 30 but you probably didnt know this.


                Nard will sit back and again wait for his younger opponenet to tire but It is my belief that Taylor will not fade this time...could be wrong but who was the last middlweight Nard ko'd? (OScar doesnt count)

                Comment

                • Tha Greatest
                  boxingscene legend
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jul 2004
                  • 15748
                  • 616
                  • 963
                  • 24,468

                  #28
                  What will Taylor's word be on December 3rd...

                  That's all that matters..
                  Keep talking Taylor..

                  Hopkins will KO you in 6!

                  Comment

                  • AintGottaClue
                    What for that be
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 6204
                    • 221
                    • 92
                    • 12,939

                    #29
                    Originally posted by scap
                    Nard is all of a sudden faded?

                    This is a bad post Sturm...I got news for you Bernard is a much better fighter at 40 then he was at 30 but you probably didnt know this.


                    Nard will sit back and again wait for his younger opponenet to tire but It is my belief that Taylor will not fade this time...could be wrong but who was the last middlweight Nard ko'd? (OScar doesnt count)
                    no your just an idiot, bernard was at his best when he KO'd echols in 2000 and KO'd tito in 2001, about 4-5 years ago, stop bugging me

                    and to answer your question the last middleweight who he stopped was morrade hakkar in 2003, bout 2 years ago

                    Comment

                    • wmute
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 8084
                      • 289
                      • 446
                      • 15,158

                      #30
                      Originally posted by scap
                      Bernard is a much better fighter at 40 then he was at 30
                      better at 35 than he was at 25 I would agree, but this is nonsense.

                      And it is testified by the fact that he has to economize his energies to the extent of losing fights (taylor) or doing nothing for rounds (eastman). I think the last badass performance by hopkins was against joppy.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP