Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Juan M. Marquez: If No Pacquiao, I Want Timothy Bradley

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Marijn View Post
    You must be ******ed to think Bradley beats Marquez, Bradley's resume is not that great. He hasn't proved ANYthing yet. He ducked Khan. Marquez by TKO 9.
    You're basing the outcome of this fight based on..... Resume?
    That's it?
    Hahahahaha

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Marijn View Post
      You must be ******ed to think Bradley beats Marquez, Bradley's resume is not that great. He hasn't proved ANYthing yet. He ducked Khan. Marquez by TKO 9.
      If he proves he is better then JMM then what then??Fuccking d!ck..

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by _original_ View Post
        Slick? I don't think Bradley is slick at all and don't know why people always make this claim. I also think Bradley throws loopy shots and has leaky defense, which might play right into Marquez' hands when he shots those straight counters. I see this fight going similar to the Juan Diaz fight, where Bradley might come off strong and bully Marquez around earlier but Marquez will start connecting and put the young bull away. Only difference is that Bradley is a way better fighter than Diaz and might not fold and find a way to win. Fight of the year candidate no doubt though.
        bradley is a multi dimensional fighter, thats his greatest attribute, the ability to adapt and fight in multiple styles.

        when hes fighting like a pressure fighter he does tend to throw looping shots, and bcuz hes so aggressive he does get caught every now and then. but his defense is still very solid.

        when hes boxing, and focusing even more on his defense he is very slick and hard to hit. watch his fight with lamont peterson and the way he boxed his ears off, he was very slick that fight and he has in others too.

        footmovement, headmovement, hands held high.. moving in and out of range, stepping in at one angle landing a combination and stepping out at another angle all night. he shut peterson down completely without once resorting to running or headlocking like some fighters i know.

        bradley is much better than diaz in every category except work rate. hes bigger, stronger, faster, hits harder, takes a better punch, more fundamentally sound, more skills, more well rounded, smarter etc..

        if marquez hurts bradley tim can adapt and box him, diaz didnt have that option.
        Last edited by #1Assassin; 12-30-2011, 06:54 AM.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Marijn View Post
          You must be ******ed to think Bradley beats Marquez, Bradley's resume is not that great. He hasn't proved ANYthing yet. He ducked Khan. Marquez by TKO 9.
          holt, witter, vasquez, cherry, alexander, peterson, abregu. all in or right before their primes, all more or less back to back. thats one hell of a resume.

          if you dont follow boxing closely i understand how you might not think he has a great resume bcuz all these guys dont have big names, but that doesnt mean they arent good fighters.

          ppl always talk about how froch had this great run that nobody in boxing can rival, bradley had a similar couple of years and except for froch barely any fighter had a tougher run of fights. hes been taking tough, high risk low reward fights for years and won big on most occassions. he has built one hell of a resume, nobody who follows boxing closely could say otherwise.

          hes proved hes one of the best p4p fighters in the sport, nobody can say otherwise. marquez is above that, hes one of the best fighters who ever lived so theres nothing wrong with picking him even by KO. but you gotta give bradley his props too, hes a handful for any fighter so you cant ever count him out.
          Last edited by #1Assassin; 12-30-2011, 07:06 AM.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Check_hooks View Post
            No hes not

            Yeah he Is. ?? Now gtfo!! . Im sick and tired of your Bull**** Mothe****er ! ive seen your ****** Ignorant Little Posts on here.from time to time ... ... If it doesn't Involve Pacquiao you go on and talk down on other fighters.with your *******ism.. Im even Surprised BS lets you even post on here and yet you have so much green k... Ohh But I must of forgot BS Are like the ***s that sit along the sidelines and just watch in Fun and Pleasure and Pull the Strings..... Truth is Marquez is Better than Pacquiao , ....... On a Side Note Im looking forward to that one day Pacquiao Retires from Boxing so I don't have to see your Pathetic Moronic Ignorant little ***** ass up in here ...

            Marquez >>>>>>>Pacquiao... Marquez is Better than Pacquiao .Either way you Slice it or Dice it.
            Last edited by SdBoxingFan83; 12-30-2011, 07:34 AM.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by #1Assassin View Post
              holt, witter, vasquez, cherry, alexander, peterson, abregu. all in or right before their primes, all more or less back to back. thats one hell of a resume.

              if you dont follow boxing closely i understand how you might not think he has a great resume bcuz all these guys dont have big names, but that doesnt mean they arent good fighters.

              ppl always talk about how froch had this great run that nobody in boxing can rival, bradley had a similar couple of years and except for froch barely any fighter had a tougher run of fights. hes been taking tough, high risk low reward fights for years and won big on most occassions. he has built one hell of a resume, nobody who follows boxing closely could say otherwise.

              hes proved hes one of the best p4p fighters in the sport, nobody can say otherwise. marquez is above that, hes one of the best fighters who ever lived so theres nothing wrong with picking him even by KO. but you gotta give bradley his props too, hes a handful for any fighter so you cant ever count him out.
              Green K for awesome post
              All started with a fight in the number 2 JWW (at the time) home turf. Brought in as a top 15 opponent expected to lose.
              He'll get his due in time.
              Last edited by Hougigo; 12-30-2011, 07:35 AM.

              Comment


              • #77
                i think bradley might be too physically strong for marquez on the inside. . . i don't see marquez keeping bradley at mid-range where he is most effective. . . bradley doesn't have an offense that is easily timed. . . he has very awkward head movement, and his style is jsut frustrating. . .

                i can't see marquez getting a rhythm down and blasting off on his wig-piece. . .

                i very much want marquez to win, but i just don't know if he can. . . it's a styles thing.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Ill tell you what....i didnt think JMM would carry weight effectively even at a catch, but after his great performance against Pac.....i can see him making easy work of Bradley with his inside attack and combinations.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    If the Marquez from the most recent Pac fight turns up then Bradley is in for a long night.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by Marijn View Post
                      You must be ******ed to think Bradley beats Marquez, Bradley's resume is not that great. He hasn't proved ANYthing yet. He ducked Khan. Marquez by TKO 9.
                      really? Bradley has solid wins over Miguel Vazquez, Junior Witter,Kendall Holt, Lamont Peterson and Devon Alexander. How are those not good wins?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP