Floyd by decision against anybody in history

[AlwaysOnTop]

A lot of people talk a bunch of ish about how this guy would have beat Floyd or that guy. Personally, I highly doubt that these same people, behind closed doors, would put a large amount of money where their mouth is.

I don't care who you mention at 147, 140, 135 or 130 (which ever version of Floyd we're dealing with), if I had a full years income on the line the safest bet I'd chose is Floyd by decision against any fighter in history.

So if you make $40k/yr and you bet against Floyd then you'd work a full year with no pay. If Floyd wins you get a $40,000 check. If you ask me, Floyd is the safest bet against anybody.

Who else would you bet your money on and why? You HAVE to bet on somebody.

You don't know shi.t from shoe polish

[ADP02]

To start off, a safe beat usually means that the one who you bet on will be heavily favored.

I said "safest".... meaning the safer of the two options. No matter if it's 2 to 1 or whatever. Vegas odds don't concern me. They're proven wrong regularly. Don't go to extremes or turn this into a drama movie. If you would bet on a certain fighter or fighters then just name them.

I'm NOT talking about Vegas odds but what odds knowledgeable boxing analysts would give and those in the know would think of as a "safe bet".

You went as far as to say that you would consider it a "safe bet" to go with Floyd and bet your year's salary. Again, for me, Floyd is not a "safe bet" against all fighters in history in all those divisions you mentioned. I would be very nervous that I can lose a year's salary .... therefore, not a safe bet.

The names? Some were already mentioned but there are more, for sure.

[mathed]

A lot of people talk a bunch of ish about how this guy would have beat Floyd or that guy. Personally, I highly doubt that these same people, behind closed doors, would put a large amount of money where their mouth is.

I don't care who you mention at 147, 140, 135 or 130 (which ever version of Floyd we're dealing with), if I had a full years income on the line the safest bet I'd chose is Floyd by decision against any fighter in history.

So if you make $40k/yr and you bet against Floyd then you'd work a full year with no pay. If Floyd wins you get a $40,000 check. If you ask me, Floyd is the safest bet against anybody.

Who else would you bet your money on and why? You HAVE to bet on somebody.

You are insane man.....Floyd ain't all that

[Rhymenocerous]

Just Welters and below? I'd consider Hearns, Robinson, Leonard and Gavilan as locks. I'd have to bet on Prime Oscar, Terry Norris, Duran, and I'm sure there are others I'm forgetting.

[AlwaysOnTop]

Threads like this proves how overrated Floyd is...And, if he retires undefeated years later it would be so much worse.

Take down that pic of Tito and Fanny before you call ANYBODY overrated...especially Mayweather..

[RichCCFC]

name 1 prime ATG on Floyd's resume

just one.

[AlwaysOnTop]

You are insane man.....Floyd ain't all that

He's better than Martinez..

[AlwaysOnTop]

name 1 prime ATG on Floyd's resume

just one.

Name a prime ATG on Slappy Joe's resume...

[tdubb]

people don't relies boxing is changing nobody in sugarraysrobenson time fought like floyd boxing evolves just like every thing else because of trainers rules judges money you wont find a fighter that fought like floyd 100 years ago and floyd would give and past fighter problems in 40 years from now people will say none of the current fighters could beat floyd

Captain Save A Hoe to the rescue

[betmen]

That's what most people say. I personally would not do that. Watch him against SRL again and see how often SRL was able to make him miss. I wouldn't trust it. Too much money on the line.

do you see how SRL win??? SRL go in there and brawl with Tommy, he got permanent eye injury and win after Tommy gassed out. never see it happening with mayweather. in twelve round rule, Tommy k.o mayweather or battered him in twelve rounds.