Great News for Amateur Boxing: A New Scoring System

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CubanGuyNYC
    Latin From Manhattan
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 15414
    • 1,679
    • 1,706
    • 112,127

    #1

    Great News for Amateur Boxing: A New Scoring System

    Here's an article I ran across last night. It's from a March 8, 2011 blog entry by Michael Rivest, over at timesunion.com. I thought those interested in amateur boxing might welcome the news, if they haven't already heard it.

    Great News for Amateur Boxing: A New Scoring System

    That’s right, folks. I’ll have more details on this in the coming week, but I wanted to let you know this much right now.

    I received a call last night from Dr. Charles Butler of the International Boxing Association (AIBA) Executive Committee, letting me know that AIBA has approved a new scoring system for amateur boxing at the big events. Among its changes are the elimination of the 1-second window and the uncoupling of judges scores. The system should be in place within ten days and, yes, it will be used in the 2012 Olypmics.

    For fans of amateur boxing, this is about as good as news can get.

    The computerized scoring system, implemented internationally in 1992, although well-intentioned, damaged the sport. It made it what amateur boxing should never, ever, be: boring.

    Although many say the system did what it was designed to do, which was to identify and weed out judges who played favorites, it brought its own nightmare of unfairness and alteration of the sport.

    The computerized system’s most notable problem has been the 1-second window. Briefly, in order for a blow to register in the system, three of the five judges had to click the appropriate button on their key pads. But each time a judge clicked, it opened a 1- second “window.” Two more judges had to click within that window for the scoring blow to count. If they were a little slow and the second went by, too bad; it was too late for the punch to count. So you can imagine that many actual punches were destined to go unrecognized.

    Combination punching, essential to boxing became pointless, since any boxer’s combination lands with a second (It had better, right?). The system encouraged a kind of boxing that has looked more like fencing, where opponents danced around each other, throwing one punch at at time.

    Good riddance.

    It’s a first step to bringing amateur boxing back to the what it should be and always was: exciting.

    Stay tuned. I’ll be talking about the scoring system changes in more detail real soon. I just wanted you to put you in a good mood.
  • oaklandstephen
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2007
    • 2457
    • 168
    • 3
    • 9,085

    #2
    YES!! I hope this is true! Thanks for posting!

    Comment

    • tx_boxing
      Up and Comer
      • Nov 2008
      • 92
      • 3
      • 0
      • 6,171

      #3
      Great Post! Great News! Merry Christmas to all of y'all

      Comment

      • Patrick Boxing
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Oct 2011
        • 128
        • 14
        • 0
        • 229

        #4
        Originally posted by CubanGuyNYC
        Here's an article I ran across last night. It's from a March 8, 2011 blog entry by Michael Rivest, over at timesunion.com. I thought those interested in amateur boxing might welcome the news, if they haven't already heard it.

        Great News for Amateur Boxing: A New Scoring System

        That’s right, folks. I’ll have more details on this in the coming week, but I wanted to let you know this much right now.

        I received a call last night from Dr. Charles Butler of the International Boxing Association (AIBA) Executive Committee, letting me know that AIBA has approved a new scoring system for amateur boxing at the big events. Among its changes are the elimination of the 1-second window and the uncoupling of judges scores. The system should be in place within ten days and, yes, it will be used in the 2012 Olypmics.

        For fans of amateur boxing, this is about as good as news can get.

        The computerized scoring system, implemented internationally in 1992, although well-intentioned, damaged the sport. It made it what amateur boxing should never, ever, be: boring.

        Although many say the system did what it was designed to do, which was to identify and weed out judges who played favorites, it brought its own nightmare of unfairness and alteration of the sport.

        The computerized system’s most notable problem has been the 1-second window. Briefly, in order for a blow to register in the system, three of the five judges had to click the appropriate button on their key pads. But each time a judge clicked, it opened a 1- second “window.” Two more judges had to click within that window for the scoring blow to count. If they were a little slow and the second went by, too bad; it was too late for the punch to count. So you can imagine that many actual punches were destined to go unrecognized.

        Combination punching, essential to boxing became pointless, since any boxer’s combination lands with a second (It had better, right?). The system encouraged a kind of boxing that has looked more like fencing, where opponents danced around each other, throwing one punch at at time.

        Good riddance.

        It’s a first step to bringing amateur boxing back to the what it should be and always was: exciting.

        Stay tuned. I’ll be talking about the scoring system changes in more detail real soon. I just wanted you to put you in a good mood.
        i hope its true thats great news

        Comment

        • Pony Boy
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Feb 2008
          • 923
          • 16
          • 0
          • 7,545

          #5
          Old news still waiting to see it in the Olympics. Wish they would do something about some of the incompetent judges in USA Boxing that give points to guys that hit with open palm and not the white knuckle part of the gloves.

          Comment

          • any craic lad?
            W-A-R
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2009
            • 5338
            • 127
            • 51
            • 18,318

            #6
            Good news now scoring points for knockdowns should be next

            Comment

            • CubanGuyNYC
              Latin From Manhattan
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 15414
              • 1,679
              • 1,706
              • 112,127

              #7
              Originally posted by any craic lad?
              Good news now scoring points for knockdowns should be next
              Agreed. But even in the old system, with judges, knockdowns didn't count for anything more than a solid punch.

              Comment

              • sammiza567
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2006
                • 818
                • 32
                • 0
                • 7,321

                #8
                always felt like a kd should at least be 3 points.

                Comment

                • winky's right
                  TEAM DISCIPLINE
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 694
                  • 43
                  • 166
                  • 7,384

                  #9
                  Seems like I'm the only one who was a fan of technical chess battles in amateur boxing

                  Comment

                  • CubanGuyNYC
                    Latin From Manhattan
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 15414
                    • 1,679
                    • 1,706
                    • 112,127

                    #10
                    Originally posted by sammiza567
                    always felt like a kd should at least be 3 points.
                    That's not a bad idea, assuming they're using the points system. They really ought to reward knockdowns in any event. The powers-that-be want to distinguish amateur boxing from its pro counterpart, but it's only watered down the sport. In the old days, amateurs didn't wear headgear. The Olympic champions were celebrated and their pro debuts were watched closely. Let's hope future change restores some luster to amateur boxing.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP