Ring magazine readers vote pacquiao-marquez the "robbery of the year" for 2011
Collapse
-
If this is true I think it is hilarious. They know how the Pinoy will flood any poll involving Pacquiao so they went ahead and blocked the Pinoy IPs because they only wanted real fans to vote
Comment
-
not even close, that tells you how little attention people pay to other fights, LAra vs Williams isComment
-
If someone robbs a house in a ****** hood, who cares? But robb the sears tower and you have a problem.
Punisher-Lara was the biggest robbery of the year to the boxing purest.
But Pacman-Marquez was robbbery of the year to the entire world. Fact is not manny people thought Pacman won the fight. In one of boxings most viewed fight, that's why it was the clear winner, imo.Comment
-
Joe Calzaghe , Joe Calzaghe, thats all i ever see you go on about. I swear he must have beat you up before or stole your girlfriend.Retired veteran judge Chuck Giampa
“I believe (Harold) Lederman (HBO’s unofficial judge commentator who scored the bout 116-112 for Pacquiao) and the three judges did not give Marquez enough credit for his effecive counter punching. As per the rules, a fighter should be given credit for effective aggression whether moving forward, backward, sideways, against the ropes or counter punching."
wait a minute Chuck Giampa scored calzaghe-hopkins 116-111 for calzaghe. how come none of this applied in that fight? maybe he has an evil twin?Comment
-
Comment