Comments Thread For: Joan Guzman vs Victor Cayo Rumors Continue To Push
Collapse
-
-
guzman didnt have a size advantage over a guy who was 6'1 fighting at 135, who it turned out was using drugs to slim down then blow up 20 pounds overnight anyway.
It's hilarious how angry you guys are getting lmaoComment
-
Comment
-
I disagree, at '35, Funeka was elite. He stopped Raheem (which nobody had done before) with ease. Arguably beat Campbell (since we're not talking about the record, apparently) when Campbell was running the division and arguably beat Guzman at a time when nobody in the division was on his level.No funeka is not a bad fighter, But elite? I know he is not and the record or not Guzman lost to him.
The funny thing is you try and back a fighter and says his only problem is discipline..Dumbass! ask any fighter and number 1 thing to be good to great fighter is discipline....and enough of the would of , could of, if, maybe, SPARE ALL of us...
IF Ali just ducked that Frazier left hook, If Hoya didnt run those last rounds, If Valero didnt die, If Pac just took those tests, If Cintron had heart....and we can go on and on.....IF DONT DO ANYTHING IN BOXING.
Great, we agree that discipline is his only fault... when he steps in the ring, though, he performs, and very well at that.Comment
-
You mean, you don't watch Guzman's fights on boxrec!?Since when do we go by official judges scorecards to prove a point? Did you watch the fight? Did Guzman not easily win the rematch? Did he not knock Funeka down? Of course he did.
If we go by the judges scorecards, the first fight was a draw but obviously guzman lost.
But Ali Funeka is a big guy, 6'1 at 135 pounds. That's a tough task especially for a guy who fought most of his career at 122 pounds.
Using boxrec to prove a point doesn't work man.Comment
Comment