115-113 x 2 - what fight were they watching?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boxingtech718v2
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2011
    • 2836
    • 146
    • 108
    • 3,782

    #21
    I think the marked the 3rd round a 9-9 rd and gave froch 3 of the last 4 rounds.
    But even the rounds Froch won could have easily gone to Ward.
    I had it 9 rounds to 3 for Ward. I really expected a closer fight.
    I think Froch was too big, to muscled up, and too slow to keep up.

    Comment

    • gauze
      white lives matter
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 4186
      • 642
      • 328
      • 10,187

      #22
      they were probably watching the same fight me and mike haynes up there were watching.

      ward didnt do ***** in the last 3rd of the fight aside from hold. and i'm not sure what he did in the first round that swept everyones scorecards on here.

      and i don't think a lot of you guys appreciate bodypunching.

      i have no issues with the 115-113 at all. neither did the other person i talk boxing with in real life. we both agreed it was a close and painful fight that wasn't as exciting as people on here seem to think it was.

      i think a lot of people focus too much on the commentary and its blatantly obvious that showtime wants ward to be a superstar. he holds the entire way through ever since the miranda fight (maybe even against buchanan, not a memorable fight at all so i dunno for sure) and the showtime crew just talks about what a tough warrior he is.

      Comment

      • kiaba360
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 19155
        • 2,326
        • 3,488
        • 45,265

        #23
        The irony of the British judge havin the widest margin for Ward lol. Imagine if Froch would've won more round, the fight would've been ruled a MD, that would've been bull**** truly.

        Comment

        • Boxing Bob
          Mexico = GOAT :mexico1:
          • Apr 2011
          • 1644
          • 72
          • 0
          • 7,899

          #24
          this a bunch of BS, this was a onesided fight. Anyone who gave Froch more than 3 rds is either biased or incompetant. At least the right guy won

          Comment

          • Njord777
            Archaic Pugilist
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2006
            • 2509
            • 177
            • 9
            • 8,928

            #25
            I was only able to really give Froch the 9th. That's it.

            Comment

            • DiegoFuego
              Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2005
              • 17338
              • 1,403
              • 586
              • 24,657

              #26
              I honestly don't see how you could give Froch more than 1 round and even that round I don't think he won (round 9). That fight was a total wash.

              Comment

              • DiegoFuego
                Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2005
                • 17338
                • 1,403
                • 586
                • 24,657

                #27
                Originally posted by Bushbaby
                Froch beats everyone at 168 not named Ward. Yes that means Bute & Anthony Dirrel too.
                Even though Dirrell already outclassed him pretty badly?

                Comment

                • Hougigo
                  Gossip Girl
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 38755
                  • 730
                  • 236
                  • 47,223

                  #28
                  I had it 8-4 Ward with Froch rounds barley going to Froch. I gave him the last 2 because it looked like Ward was trying to hug it out instead of fight. Honestly.... the constant clinching was starting to piss me off... specially the 12th.
                  Ward won pretty clearly though IMO and saw that one judge had Froch up through 5 rounds

                  Comment

                  • bojangles1987
                    bo jungle
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 41118
                    • 1,326
                    • 357
                    • 63,028

                    #29
                    Seems likely those judges didn't want to appear as if they were robbing Froch since they were American and Canadian. I don't think they would have robbed Ward if the fight was closer, but those scores did worry me.

                    Comment

                    • Easy-E
                      Gotta want it
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 22686
                      • 865
                      • 1,739
                      • 32,777

                      #30
                      It's scary to think that idiot judges almost took this clear victory for Ward. Something needs to be done about the judging in these fights.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP