Sick of fighters complaining they got robbed....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SixFootGiant
    Banned
    • Jun 2011
    • 848
    • 28
    • 4
    • 998

    #31
    If it's a close fight, then it's not a robbery. Decision could've went either way, so stop bi**ching.

    As competent boxing fans, we should all be able to tell the difference between a robbery or a toss-up decision

    Comment

    • jimmy1569
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2005
      • 2920
      • 114
      • 0
      • 3,083

      #32
      Originally posted by SoggyLungs
      this is how i kind of feel about the whole marquez vs pacquiao trilogy. if you try three times to beat your opponent and you fail all three times then maybe you need to look at yourself and stop blaming everyone else. also marquez even said before the third fight that he was going for the knockout because he felt that was the only way for him to win, but yet he hardly fought like a guy that wanted the knockout.
      See... now. we're getting it.. Expect that the way more popular guy is going to get the benefit of the doubt.. TAKE the law into Your OWN HANDS & stop blaming crooked judging who may or may not have an agenda.. 36 rds you had to Ko HIM.. albeit he also had 36 rds to ko you & also failed but his name is pacman & your name is not. Is it fair?.. no Is LIFE ALWAYS FAIR?.... NO.. sometimes you have to be the judge & the jury to get a rightful conviction as a KO IS 100% CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP