If you were in charge of boxing...
Collapse
-
-
I would make fighter purses performance based. That way there's none of this cash cow bull**** getting in the way of big fights. You want the bigger cut?? Go out there and win. The more emphatic the win..the bigger cut of the purse.
I would also employ incentive bonuses for fight of the night and knockout of the night. Giving undercard fighters the opportunity to make some decent money for showing up main eventers.Comment
-
If you were in charge of boxing how would you run it? Would you make it a tournament system for each weight class (like the super 6)?
Me personally I would get rid of all of the belts, make 1 belt per division. No more catch weight fights. And the champ of each division must fight at least twice per year, one fight being a mandatory against the #1 contender and the 2nd fight being with anyone within the top 4 of that division.
how would you guys run it if you were in charge of everything?we got to remember their was a reason not only politics why we have more than one Boxing World Organization, a lot of regional areas thought that they are not getting a fair shake on things so instead of getting rid of all the so called world boxing bodies, will unifying them as one, try to minimize the number of WORLD TITLE belts to one per division and upgrade the status of Regional Championships specially the lesser know regions in Asia and AfricaI would do away with all bodies and form 1 world body.
each weight would have a world champion, a US champion and an intercontinental champion like old school werstling. The US and intercontinental champs would be ranked no lower than 3rd.
world champs could only defend title against #1, #2 or #3 ranked guys and must fight twice per year minimum.Comment
-
Comment
Comment