If you were in charge of boxing...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Casual_Fan
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Nov 2011
    • 563
    • 19
    • 46
    • 717

    #21
    Originally posted by S IP U IR S xII
    As much as i think Dana White is a D-Bag, i love how the UFC is run. None of this politics BS. Best fight the best, and there is no wondering more times than not.
    Boxing promoters don't realize that having the best champion you can have is the best cash cow.

    Comment

    • shadeyfizzle
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2008
      • 7448
      • 160
      • 43
      • 13,959

      #22
      I would make fighter purses performance based. That way there's none of this cash cow bull**** getting in the way of big fights. You want the bigger cut?? Go out there and win. The more emphatic the win..the bigger cut of the purse.

      I would also employ incentive bonuses for fight of the night and knockout of the night. Giving undercard fighters the opportunity to make some decent money for showing up main eventers.

      Comment

      • JOM'S
        MANILA ICE
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2004
        • 13036
        • 1,420
        • 1,381
        • 28,113

        #23
        Originally posted by dalycityboss
        If you were in charge of boxing how would you run it? Would you make it a tournament system for each weight class (like the super 6)?

        Me personally I would get rid of all of the belts, make 1 belt per division. No more catch weight fights. And the champ of each division must fight at least twice per year, one fight being a mandatory against the #1 contender and the 2nd fight being with anyone within the top 4 of that division.

        how would you guys run it if you were in charge of everything?
        Originally posted by Big Dunn
        I would do away with all bodies and form 1 world body.

        each weight would have a world champion, a US champion and an intercontinental champion like old school werstling. The US and intercontinental champs would be ranked no lower than 3rd.

        world champs could only defend title against #1, #2 or #3 ranked guys and must fight twice per year minimum.
        we got to remember their was a reason not only politics why we have more than one Boxing World Organization, a lot of regional areas thought that they are not getting a fair shake on things so instead of getting rid of all the so called world boxing bodies, will unifying them as one, try to minimize the number of WORLD TITLE belts to one per division and upgrade the status of Regional Championships specially the lesser know regions in Asia and Africa

        Comment

        • whoelibits
          Contender
          • Sep 2011
          • 169
          • 7
          • 8
          • 6,265

          #24
          Originally posted by Casual_Fan
          6. Super Heavyweight Division.
          Where would you set the weight limit for the heavyweights? About 240?

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP