I didn't know Lemieux lost again and to a guy Angulo obliterated in 1 rd.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Ring Rankings: Vitali Klitschko enters top ten P4P
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostYou talk about delusions and than in the very next sentence you go on to say you represent Vitaly....lmao!!! Vitaly has no idea who you are. If he did he be worried about the safety of his dirty underwear and used condoms. If he did he'd be ashamed and kick your ass for embarrassing him and your false representation. And no, Im pretty sure you're just a little fella trying to live through someone else's accomplishments and don't have any of those characteristics. To bad.....so sad.
The fact that i'm even engaging you with this nonsense.. tells me it's a slow day on the forums... much bigger fish to fry & bait than someone who's getting his rocks off over my name recognition.. fact is my posts are remembered here.. shet even you have them up on your profile for everyone to see.... you're a blip on the radar trying to get some publicity off of me. So as i stated earlier & however amusing you might seem to be to try to get me off of my game.. do like my Boy Vitali does to 90% of his opponents & that is get stopped from posting to yours truly... Vitali & I are both above your nonsense.... kapish!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Money Shot View PostAll the haters have against him is a cut over an eye and a dislocated shoulder. Has barely lost a round since he came back.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Dudley View PostSo what your saying is. The various magazine mentioned that have a huge boxing lineage going back further than you or I is incorrect. I assure you, those guys do not scribble down notes, they are called PRESS ROW. WHO ACTUALLY GO TO SEE EVERY FIGHT! I personally have seen all of Vitali's fights including vlads They are great people, but in the historical sense they are in a division of journeymen. I have seen all the great fights or recent and have a vested interest in looking back in the historical context of how deep boxing has been over the decades. If you propose history is incorrect based on the mere fact that it's old, is baseless and illogical.
You focus merely on one fighter and do not look at the whole. Do you think Floyd would hold up against the great Sugar Ray Robinson? No he would not! The times have changed including the perused level of excellence. You look at only what is put in front of you and not in context. that is a fact.
Think about this, WHO has WLAD Beatin? In context to his ERA? He lost to LEWIS. WHO HAS HE FACED AND HOW DID HE DO AGAINST THE TOUGHEST COMPETITION?!?! BECAUSE THAT"S WHAT IT ALL COMES DOWN TO! AND BE CONSISTENTLY DOMINANT, DUDE DUCKED OUT AGAINST BIRD BECAUSE HIS SHOULDER HURT WHEN HE WAS WINNING! WTF!??! THAT"S YOUR LEGACY!
This is your logic being DEBUNKED!
http://www.boxingscene.com/chris-byr...chko-joke--409
FORGET YOU and your IGNORANT OPINION!Last edited by jimmy1569; 12-13-2011, 03:05 PM.
Comment
Comment