Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Ring Rankings: Vitali Klitschko enters top ten P4P

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    I didn't know Lemieux lost again and to a guy Angulo obliterated in 1 rd.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
      You talk about delusions and than in the very next sentence you go on to say you represent Vitaly....lmao!!! Vitaly has no idea who you are. If he did he be worried about the safety of his dirty underwear and used condoms. If he did he'd be ashamed and kick your ass for embarrassing him and your false representation. And no, Im pretty sure you're just a little fella trying to live through someone else's accomplishments and don't have any of those characteristics. To bad.....so sad.
      Oh .. so now you do standup.. You don't think Vitali knows ALREADY that he's the baddest mofo when he gets in the ring? He's too humble to flat out say he'd destroy every fighter who ever lived.. so that's where i come in. I don't have to worry about being politically correct. He doesn't need bogus pound for pound lists to verify his worth as a fighter. Don't worry about my credentials.. son. I don't play for the other team but thanks for asking... i'll leave you to air out his dirty laundry.. You do that quite well.


      The fact that i'm even engaging you with this nonsense.. tells me it's a slow day on the forums... much bigger fish to fry & bait than someone who's getting his rocks off over my name recognition.. fact is my posts are remembered here.. shet even you have them up on your profile for everyone to see.... you're a blip on the radar trying to get some publicity off of me. So as i stated earlier & however amusing you might seem to be to try to get me off of my game.. do like my Boy Vitali does to 90% of his opponents & that is get stopped from posting to yours truly... Vitali & I are both above your nonsense.... kapish!

      Comment


      • #43
        Cong**** and Well Deserved.

        .

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Joeyzagz View Post
          Cong**** and Well Deserved.
          Props for being a good sport about it.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Money Shot View Post
            All the haters have against him is a cut over an eye and a dislocated shoulder. Has barely lost a round since he came back.
            I agree the only thing I used against him in the past was the stoppage lost to Chris Byrd. Too be honest I've always thought Vitali was the better Klit bro but you can't knock those two and where they stand in the P4P listing and all the great work they do outside the squared circle. They just happen to be great at time nobody else is. Hell they fight everybody but eachother.

            Comment


            • #46
              I've always liked Vitali, think he's beast.

              Comment


              • #47
                well deserved



                KLITSCHKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                Comment


                • #48
                  Very good news.
                  Big Vitali deserved it since so long...
                  Great Champ!

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Dudley View Post
                    So what your saying is. The various magazine mentioned that have a huge boxing lineage going back further than you or I is incorrect. I assure you, those guys do not scribble down notes, they are called PRESS ROW. WHO ACTUALLY GO TO SEE EVERY FIGHT! I personally have seen all of Vitali's fights including vlads They are great people, but in the historical sense they are in a division of journeymen. I have seen all the great fights or recent and have a vested interest in looking back in the historical context of how deep boxing has been over the decades. If you propose history is incorrect based on the mere fact that it's old, is baseless and illogical.

                    You focus merely on one fighter and do not look at the whole. Do you think Floyd would hold up against the great Sugar Ray Robinson? No he would not! The times have changed including the perused level of excellence. You look at only what is put in front of you and not in context. that is a fact.

                    Think about this, WHO has WLAD Beatin? In context to his ERA? He lost to LEWIS. WHO HAS HE FACED AND HOW DID HE DO AGAINST THE TOUGHEST COMPETITION?!?! BECAUSE THAT"S WHAT IT ALL COMES DOWN TO! AND BE CONSISTENTLY DOMINANT, DUDE DUCKED OUT AGAINST BIRD BECAUSE HIS SHOULDER HURT WHEN HE WAS WINNING! WTF!??! THAT"S YOUR LEGACY!

                    This is your logic being DEBUNKED!



                    http://www.boxingscene.com/chris-byr...chko-joke--409

                    FORGET YOU and your IGNORANT OPINION!
                    You're embarassing yourself & you're all over the place. You can't even distinguish between the two brothers for crying out loud. I got news for you & all the haters out there.. sunshine....... Vitali participated in some of the era of the 90's YOU & OTHERS call the cream of the crop & performed exactly the same & with the same results.. he faced alot of the fighters the so called greats of the 90's faced like Bowe.. Lewis.. Holyfield.. Foreman did & wiped the ******** floor with them in even more impressive fashion.... go look up some of the common opponents these greats before him.. had.. there's at least a handful to two where you can gauge how each fared against them as opposed to how Vitali fared vs them. The biggest misconception is that Vitali has fought all bums.. he's fought ALOT of what all the great heavies of the past have faced... you all look at four or 5 fights these former greats had against each other & discount ALL the other journeymen & cans THEY FACED.. conveniently i might add to suit your agenda so you can devalue what the bros have bought to the table which is utter ****ing destruction in the heavyweight division the likes that we've never seen .. esp. Vitali who has NO FUNDAMENTAL boxing flaws.. Wlad has several... sorry but if the only negative thing you can say EVER about a guy in the ring is that he got severely cut up in a fight he was winning & his shoulder required surgery in a fight he was winning & those are his ONLY blemishes WHILE HE'S DONE AT LEAST A DOZEN different things no other heavy has ever been able to achieve... then you give it up to him.... YOU don't go trying to find EVERy ****ING excuse in the book to devalue what he & ONLY he has ever been able to achieve... THERE'S A ******** REASON he's the only one that has possibly done to his opponents what no other heavy before him has done & I can TELL you for a fact that his opponents being weak is the most sorriest excuse one can possibly conjure up. This is all the media feeding lies to the public... playing favorites.. stating how comp is pathetic. The Klitschko's are destroying hapless victims... all lies.. they're doing what MJ did & are denying fighters belts & championships that otherwise they would've easily attained going up ONLY against each other instead of having to face the brothers.. who are the so called greats of eras past... You have The Klitschko's of thos era... you ONLY had Tyson Lewis & Holyfield & perhaps Bowe IN the 90's.. 80's you only had Holmes... 70's it was Frazier. Foreman & Ali. before that Liston.. Marciano & Louis. to say that the Klitschko's can't compare to these selective few fighters WHO fought just as many journeyman. as the biggest lie that haters & media alike will have us believe is that they faced each other every time.. when 80 to 90 % of the time they WERE fighting the exact same caliber of opposition as the brothers have faced.. Who did Klitschko beat.... all you can say without any opinions or bias is 43 various fighters.. everything else is JUST your opinion of the fighters...just because you have an opinion of the fighters which may or may not be true.. doesn't give anyone the right to trash Klitschko for the way he performed against them... how he performed against them was near flawlessly... the real determining factor to ask yourself instead of automatically deGRADING him is not how you think he would've fared against past heavies but how past heavies would've fared against his opposition.. would they have had similar success... is it more likely they'd perform as well.. given the fact they DIDN'T do what he's done to similar comp they faced for 80% to 90% of the time.... or is it better to just think he'd fare worse straight up against the greats of the past when there's no indication AT ALL of this occurring. See that's what you & all the mags are doing & to say that it's logical would be a stretch... you're creating a negative scenario & perception around his performances that have nothing to with how he fights. how he's fared in the ring as even any hater can say it's near immaculate..you do NOT judge a fighters worth & the boxing ability of Vitali KJlitscko in this manner.... he's not an ordinary fighter.. he's NOT a journey man.. he's one of the alltime great fighters.. to strictly punish because you deem his opponents weak.. completely disregarding the fact he's had a say in how weak they've looked is why boxing is messed up & it;s all about favoritism & NOT what you actually do in the ring.. the sterngth.. size & boxing skills you possess.. Vitali has more of those 3 sss THAN ANY FIGHTER WHO EVER LIVED & tHat;s my ultimate tie breaker when all the bs of his competition & resume.. who he's fought.. biggest win.. biggest loss.. cut through all that BS. it's him that has more of those 3 sss than anybody & that's the one thing you ALL pretend is not there.
                    Last edited by jimmy1569; 12-13-2011, 03:05 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      About time they got recognition. The Klitschko brothers are the most dominate fighters in the sport right now.

                      When's the last time Vitali lost a round?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP