Why don't we all just admit that home cooking exists everywhere?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dc6112
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 1059
    • 50
    • 10
    • 7,849

    #1

    Why don't we all just admit that home cooking exists everywhere?

    People accuse Europeans of home cooking, US fighters of gettin home cooked decisions... Let's face it. When the crowd is cheering at every single punch the local throws, hit or miss, and are almost silent even when the visiting fighter is landing, then it's going to sway judges. They're human. All we can do to change this is demand championship fights get fought in neutral venues with neutral judges. Anyone got any better ideas?
  • LeG00N
    All Time Great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2011
    • 20386
    • 1,081
    • 1,364
    • 25,738

    #2
    Not in Mexico bro......

    Comment

    • The Hammer
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 50797
      • 3,416
      • 8,704
      • 58,851

      #3
      The USA is by far the worst for robberies and shady officiating in recent years.

      And while Brits and other Europeans ADMIT when a visiting fighter has been jobbed (like all the Brits admitted Page should have won against Dallas), the Americans tend to self-righteously deny it while b1tching about robberies in other countries.

      Comment

      • dc6112
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2007
        • 1059
        • 50
        • 10
        • 7,849

        #4
        Originally posted by Freedom.
        The USA is by far the worst for robberies and shady officiating in recent years.

        And while Brits and other Europeans ADMIT when a visiting fighter has been jobbed (like all the Brits admitted Page should have won against Dallas), the Americans tend to self-righteously deny it while b1tching about robberies in other countries.

        Helenius-Chisora? Sturm-Macklin? That's just the two that immediately come to mind. Why do you think people here deny robberies? Name the first one that comes to mind? Because Khan Peterson, the commentators and people i talked to knew Khan got phucked over in that fight.

        Comment

        • Spray_resistant
          Vacant interim regular(C)
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 29739
          • 3,017
          • 1,589
          • 53,384

          #5
          Originally posted by dc6112
          Helenius-Chisora? Sturm-Macklin? That's just the two that immediately come to mind. Why do you think people here deny robberies? Name the first one that comes to mind? Because Khan Peterson, the commentators and people i talked to knew Khan got phucked over in that fight.
          Robberies happen everywhere but c'mon Saturday's fight was a very close fight that could have gone either way, no robbery here.

          Comment

          • The Hammer
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 50797
            • 3,416
            • 8,704
            • 58,851

            #6
            Originally posted by dc6112
            Helenius-Chisora? Sturm-Macklin? That's just the two that immediately come to mind. Why do you think people here deny robberies? Name the first one that comes to mind? Because Khan Peterson, the commentators and people i talked to knew Khan got phucked over in that fight.
            You remember Sturm-Macklin (which wasn't really a robbery) and Chisora-Helenius (which was) but what about:

            Mares-Agbeko I (crooked referee)
            Maytthese-Judah
            Maytthese-Alexander
            Berto-Zaveck (illegal headbutt caused cut, crooked ref)
            Kotelnik-Alexander

            etc.

            Comment

            • Phantomas
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2011
              • 1208
              • 32
              • 9
              • 8,245

              #7
              Originally posted by MANIAC310
              Not in Mexico bro......
              I give props to the wbc for bringing international judges and referees.

              Comment

              • SoulByThePound
                Undisputed Champion
                • Jun 2008
                • 1364
                • 35
                • 8
                • 7,512

                #8
                Originally posted by Freedom.
                The USA is by far the worst for robberies and shady officiating in recent years.

                And while Brits and other Europeans ADMIT when a visiting fighter has been jobbed (like all the Brits admitted Page should have won against Dallas), the Americans tend to self-righteously deny it while b1tching about robberies in other countries.
                so direll beat froch right:*******:

                Comment

                • SoulByThePound
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 1364
                  • 35
                  • 8
                  • 7,512

                  #9
                  Originally posted by dc6112
                  Helenius-Chisora? Sturm-Macklin? That's just the two that immediately come to mind. Why do you think people here deny robberies? Name the first one that comes to mind? Because Khan Peterson, the commentators and people i talked to knew Khan got phucked over in that fight.
                  the english commentators said khan lost, hbo ****riders anti american boxers said khan won

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP