I was just wondering what people's opinions on this fight were.
I dont know what it was, but the media hype surrounding Hopkins had me thinking, before the fight, that he was unbeatable. He had defended his title 20 times, and was amongst the top 1 or 2 in the P4P rankings.
What was it about Taylor's style that beat Hopkins. Or do you think that the fight was a gift from the judge's. I have speculated both, but i have to say. If the judges came to a split decision then Taylor must have done something correctly to try and topple Hopkins. I very much doubt there was any corruption in the fight.
I am still waiting on downloading the fight, as i dont have HBO or Showtime, because i live in the UK. But the Howard Eastman fight was televised here and i learnt a lot about Hopkins style from that fight alone. He quite succesfully outboxed Eastman, a man known for his heavy hands, and perhaps this was his downfall against Taylor. I heard that he lost a lot of the early rounds against Taylor, but began to come back in the later part of the fight. Do you think it would have been better for Hopkins to add to his 32 Knock Outs, or would this just tire him out earlier and leave him exposed for a possible KO against him.
Personally, i wouldnt go as far as saying that if Hopkins went for a KO he would risk being knocked out. I rated his chin in the Eastman fight. He got hit with some nice shots and took them well. So i doubt that he would suffer a late KO. Either way it has set up a nice background to the coming fight in 2006.
Anyway what are your opinions on the first fight?
I dont know what it was, but the media hype surrounding Hopkins had me thinking, before the fight, that he was unbeatable. He had defended his title 20 times, and was amongst the top 1 or 2 in the P4P rankings.
What was it about Taylor's style that beat Hopkins. Or do you think that the fight was a gift from the judge's. I have speculated both, but i have to say. If the judges came to a split decision then Taylor must have done something correctly to try and topple Hopkins. I very much doubt there was any corruption in the fight.
I am still waiting on downloading the fight, as i dont have HBO or Showtime, because i live in the UK. But the Howard Eastman fight was televised here and i learnt a lot about Hopkins style from that fight alone. He quite succesfully outboxed Eastman, a man known for his heavy hands, and perhaps this was his downfall against Taylor. I heard that he lost a lot of the early rounds against Taylor, but began to come back in the later part of the fight. Do you think it would have been better for Hopkins to add to his 32 Knock Outs, or would this just tire him out earlier and leave him exposed for a possible KO against him.
Personally, i wouldnt go as far as saying that if Hopkins went for a KO he would risk being knocked out. I rated his chin in the Eastman fight. He got hit with some nice shots and took them well. So i doubt that he would suffer a late KO. Either way it has set up a nice background to the coming fight in 2006.
Anyway what are your opinions on the first fight?
Comment