Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Post ya scorecards for the Khan Peterson fight..

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    I though for Peterson deserved it.

    But my scorecard still had Khan 113-112 up even with the point deductions.

    Weird fight. But I suppose the wrong winner was ultimately declared with the ref being such an important factor.

    2 points for such a trivial foul is a disgrace.

    Comment


    • #82
      Bump thread....

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Burning Phoenix View Post
        K - P

        10 - 8
        9 - 10
        9 - 10
        9 - 10
        10 - 9
        10 - 9
        8 - 10
        9 - 10
        10 - 9
        10 - 9
        10 - 9
        9 - 9

        Total 113-112 for khan.
        This right here exactamente!

        Comment


        • #84
          Khan by a little bit.

          Comment


          • #85
            Had it a draw with the deductions. Close fight, can't really argue either way.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Frozencat
              Yea, it was pretty strange. I think pretty much every professional ref said the wouldn't do it. But I actually didn't have that much of a problem with it.

              The really shady part is the man in the black hat crossing out the score of 10-10 in one round, and scoring it 10-8 for Peterson. And Peterson never knocked down Khan, so how can a non official person score an even round 10-8?? Very shady, and very dirty.

              Especially considering the same guy was celebrating with the Petersons after the victory.

              I don't think boxing can get any more corrupt than this. I wonder how much Peterson himself was involved with this scandal.

              It's disheartening to see this blatant sort of cheating, you never like to see someone lose like that.
              It was scored 10-8 because the point deduction..I believe it was the 12 rd they had to change for that reason..The only scorecard that was suspect was the one for Khan tbh...

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by savorduhflavor View Post
                Let's be real, it was an 8-4 fight in Khan's favor. I love Lamont but he didn't win, it was a close, competitive, CLEAR win for Khan. And I can't stand Khan, but he got robbed.
                For Romebyko
                Last edited by Dirk Diggler UK; 03-20-2012, 09:58 AM.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                  For Romebyko
                  That dude undoubtedly lost money betting on Khan..So that's why he saw the fight how he saw it..LMAO..

                  But I don't care how anybody else saw the fight tbh,I had a draw,and had Peterson winning live...You even said while watching it live you felt Peterson won..It was a close fight and,anybody who say's otherwise has another motive for doing so..Just my opinion..

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
                    That dude undoubtedly lost money betting on Khan..So that's why he saw the fight how he saw it..LMAO..

                    But I don't care how anybody else saw the fight tbh,I had a draw,and had Peterson winning live...You even said while watching it live you felt Peterson won..It was a close fight and,anybody who say's other wise has another motive for doing so..Just my opinion..
                    I watched it drunk and was more pissed off at the way Khan was fighting and yeah I felt Peterson deserved it for his effort. But I then scored it sober and it was very easy to score in rounds.

                    That guy clearly didn't have a motive so your opinion in moot. I can pull up other posts. It was a close but CLEAR victory for Khan.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      i had it 113-112 for peterson but the deduction was key

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP