EVERY single fight that is close is a "robbery". It's only natural, boxing fans are more rabid than ever these days when there are fewer and fewer fans and more and more simple nuthuggers, sackswingers, and bandwagon riders(****riders).
The truth is, EVERY SINGLE FIGHT that is close will always be called a "robbery" by the side whose man lost.
This was not a robbery why? Well simple because the phantom point deductions were over ridden by the fact that Peterson was also ruled a false knockdown that was not a real knockdown where I believe he tripped over Khan's leg so that cancels out one of the point deductions. The other can easily be argued turns the fight into a draw, or simply that Khan was holding his head down a lot anyway and is lucky he did not get deducted for that.
Simple result: No robbery, go cry some more you butthurts.

The truth is, EVERY SINGLE FIGHT that is close will always be called a "robbery" by the side whose man lost.
This was not a robbery why? Well simple because the phantom point deductions were over ridden by the fact that Peterson was also ruled a false knockdown that was not a real knockdown where I believe he tripped over Khan's leg so that cancels out one of the point deductions. The other can easily be argued turns the fight into a draw, or simply that Khan was holding his head down a lot anyway and is lucky he did not get deducted for that.
Simple result: No robbery, go cry some more you butthurts.

Comment