Robbed!!!!

[wazaa.]

I scored it a draw.

When ur taking a guy on in HIS Town and fight on the backfoot, holding all the time, pushing and elbowing and just looking so flustered all the time u cant complain with the decision in a fight this close. Peterson looked like he wanted it so bad, i was happy for him even though i went in rooting for Amir and scored it a draw

You can also look at it like this: Amir is the champion and when it's a close fight, the champion should be given the benefit of the doubt at the end.

[AlwaysOnTop]

You can also look at it like this: Amir is the champion and when it's a close fight, the champion should be given the benefit of the doubt at the end.

Nobody should be given anything..especially if they're running like crazy and holding on for dear life.

Khan didn't fight like a Champion...he never does.

[Sage84]

No robbery. It was a close fight. Technically the point deductions were completely fair, Khan did foul, its just some refs are stricter than others, Dont foul if you want to keep you're points, simples. Also, if you want to be a *** about it the KD wasn't a KD.

Close fight, no robbery. What's the point in the Robbery? Peterson isn't a money maker, him being the champ doesn't benefit anyone?

[AlwaysOnTop]

No robbery. It was a close fight. Technically the point deductions were completely fair, Khan did foul, its just some refs are stricter than others, Dont foul if you want to keep you're points, simples. Also, if you want to be a *** about it the KD wasn't a KD.

Close fight, no robbery. What's the point in the Robbery? Peterson isn't a money maker, him being the champ doesn't benefit anyone?

Khan isn't a blockbuster either...and why do you care?

This is boxing not a popularity contest.

Certain fighters bring out the bi.tchiest fans.

[Sage84]

You can also look at it like this: Amir is the champion and when it's a close fight, the champion should be given the benefit of the doubt at the end.

Haha, benefit of the doubt? You're watching the wrong sport. Do you even know who fights are judged? There is no such thing as the benefit of the doubt.

The rounds are scored on a round by round basis, the cards are collected at the end of each round and the judges are given a new card for the next round. The judge can't just look at his entire card at the end and go "Oh, thats close, I'll just change a couple of the rounds here and there to make sure the champ gets the benefit of the doubt"

[Sage84]

Khan isn't a blockbuster either...and why do you care?

This is boxing not a popularity contest.

Certain fighters bring out the bi.tchiest fans.

I don't care. I'm no Peterson fan, all I'm saying is there is no motive for a robbery, it was a close fight and went to fighter A instead of fighter B. How is that *****y?

Oh and Khan is a blockbuster in the UK and THE money man of the division.

[turkas]

You can also look at it like this: Amir is the champion and when it's a close fight, the champion should be given the benefit of the doubt at the end.

You realize boxing is scored by rounds right? There is no such thing as the benefit of the doubt in boxing.

[Nuurzhaelan]

HAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA.

It's called Karma.

That's what being an ignorant loudmouth piece of **** gets for you in the end!!!!!!!

People misuse the word incessantly. You probably mean rude. And if you mean rude, then I am curious how being confident is being rude.