Do you believe marquez or pac should be 3-0 over the other???

[shadeyfizzle]

First off my opinion is that pac won the 1st fight and the other 2fights should both be draws. But plenty of arguments could be made both ways.

1st fight pac knocked down marquez 3times in the 1st rd and it was a draw because of a scoring error by a judge. Many claim however that after picking himself up off the canvas marquez swept the following 11rds.

2nd fight once again knockdown made the difference. Argument for marquez is that he outboxed, outlanded pacquiao.

3rd fight is where *******s and dinamitards switch places. Marquez keeps himself off the mat and lands the more visible, harder looking shots, but was actually outboxed and outlanded by pacquiao according to compubox.

[Casual_Fan]

I don't remember how I scored the first fight. The second one I gave to Pacquiao. The third one to Márquez.

[Toyman]

pacquiao clearly won all 3

lets put it in perspective

out of the 9 judges, only 2 scorecards had marquez winning. 6 had pac winning, and 1 draw [we have to consider the 1st fight a win for pacquiao, because the judge ADMITTED to scorig it wrong]

[Heeb]

I thought the first two could have gone either way and I felt Marquez won the 3rd.

[Deevel916]

I had Pac winning I and II, while I had JMM winning III.

In thier first fight, one judge made a scoring error by scoring round 1 a 10-7 rounds when it should have been a 10-6 round. He later admitted to his error.

In the second fight the difference was the KD.

I had JMM winning a UD in thier 3rd fight.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

i have PAC winning 4-0...he kicked his ass so bad, i gave him an extra win

[gmc_rfc_06]

1-1-1 for me.

[Toyman]

also, im not sure where people are getting the idea that marquez was landing cleaner shots in the 3rd fight.

because its obvious as day, he wasnt

here:



does marquez look like he was landing clean shots? no - it does look like he was receiving them though

[mccready]

Pac won the first. Marquez won II and III.

[shadeyfizzle]

I thought this thread would attract more heated debate than this