Comments Thread For: R. Mayweather: I Think Pacquiao-Floyd Will Happen in May

[PacTard]

Its good to see the *******s starting to come back out in the delusional blind faith that made them fanatics in the first place. Its a little funny to hear so many of them that probably only started watching boxing in the last 2-3 years learn the phrase "styles make fights." This has made them feel a little more at ease after the JMM fight. And for the truly lost, they've been made to feel comfortable with the growing myth that Pac tanked the JMM fight in order to lure Mayweather into fighting him. Never mind that Mayweather was calling for Pac prior to the JMM fight. Never mind that Pac and crew have been the ones balking at the mention of fighting Money. Pac is so great, he musta been trying to trick Money by getting beaten by a guy that Money humiliated.

Truth is, the *******s are the ones that have built this fight into the mega event it is today. Actual boxing people have long since dismissed it as a cute little gimmick, but very much a mismatch. So keep holding on to hope *******s. Keep infesting boards like this with nonsense. You'll be heard and build this into the biggest event in boxing history. I am very confident in two things. Mayweather is gonna beat the ever lovin' crap outta Pac. And at least one of you will be so shocked and depressed at the outcome that you'll commit suicide.

Actually, you sound just like a fanboy with this post. "Actual boxing people have long since dismissed it as a cute little gimmick, but very much a mismatch." Care to show us some examples? Only a fanboy would be this delusional. Both are great fighters, and it would not surprise me if either guy won. Styles do make fights, but that doesn't necessarily mean that one style is better than the other style. Honestly, this post does nothing but make you look like the Floyd Mayweather version of a "*******."

[thatnickuh]

Really. Exactly why will he be forced to throw more punches?

That poster is a midget mentally. He makes the same nonsensial arguments over and over even after they have been refuted.

[PacTard]

That poster is a midget mentally. He makes the same nonsensial arguments over and over even after they have been refuted.

They've been refuted? That's funny. I must have missed the fight, because the only way his argument could be refuted is to point to some evidence. So I'm assuming that you have some evidence from the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight to support your claim that his argument has been refuted?

[PacTard]

That poster is a midget mentally. He makes the same nonsensial arguments over and over even after they have been refuted.

Furthermore, please refrain from insulting the intelligence of others when you clearly have the grammar and syntax of a six year old dyslexic child.

[thatnickuh]

They've been refuted? That's funny. I must have missed the fight, because the only way his argument could be refuted is to point to some evidence. So I'm assuming that you have some evidence from the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight to support your claim that his argument has been refuted?

You don't even know what arguments I'm referring to. How about you familiarize yourself with his arguments/opinions of how a potential Maywather-Pacquiao fight will go before you come at me with your nonsense.

[PacTard]

You don't even know what arguments I'm referring to. How about you familiarize yourself with his arguments/opinions of how a potential Maywather-Pacquiao fight will go before you come at me with your nonsense.

I'm skeptical that you even know what refuted means...

[thatnickuh]

I'm skeptical that you even know what refuted means...

I couldn't care less of what you're skeptical of. You come across as whiny little girl who's just looking for an argument. You're coming at me in defense of someone who's position you aren't even clear on. Run your little angry self along somewhere. No need to take your frustration at the life out on people here.

[PacTard]

You don't even know what arguments I'm referring to. How about you familiarize yourself with his arguments/opinions of how a potential Maywather-Pacquiao fight will go before you come at me with your nonsense.

You can't "refute" his argument without any evidence. As the fight hasn't occured yet, I'd venture to say that it would be pretty difficult to obtain any actual evidence or apt examples to support your claim. You can offer your opinion, however, since you have zero evidence to support your claim it will hold no more credibility or weight than his argument. So please stop trying to speak down to other posters when you really have no idea what the f(uk you're talking about.

[PacTard]

I couldn't care less of what you're skeptical of. You come across as whiny little girl who's just looking for an argument. You're coming at me in defense of someone who's position you aren't even clear on. Run your little angry self along somewhere. No need to take your frustration at the life out on people here.

Is this where I should insert a "U Mad?" gif? You seem upset. Though, I'd be upset too if the education system failed me that badly...

[thatnickuh]

You can't "refute" his argument without any evidence. As the fight hasn't occured yet, I'd venture to say that it would be pretty difficult to obtain any actual evidence or apt examples to support your claim. You can offer your opinion, however, since you have zero evidence to support your claim it will hold no more credibility or weight than his argument. So please stop trying to speak down to other posters when you really have no idea what the f(uk you're talking about.

You're not too bright huh? One doesn't necessarily need evidence to refute an opinion, an intelligent argument will do. One could make the argument that
Pacquiao will defeat Mayweather simply because he throws more punches(not saying that's his argument), but I wouldn't need to wait until after after the fight to refute or rebut that simple nonsensical argument. So what grade are you in?