Comments Thread For: Khan on Prescott Rematch: Not Now, Maybe in The Future

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boxingtech718v2
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2011
    • 2836
    • 146
    • 108
    • 3,782

    #31
    Presscott needs to rack up 5 good wins and win a belt at WW before he can make any demands. He should move up he looks weight drained at the lower weights. I mean he looks taller than Amir, I don't even know how he was making LW.

    Comment

    • [SyrianUser]
      Banned
      • Nov 2011
      • 127
      • 17
      • 6
      • 250

      #32
      I wonder in how many seconds Kahn will get knocked out in the rematch

      Comment

      • NEETzsche
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2011
        • 8389
        • 283
        • 176
        • 29,441

        #33
        prescott is beneath khan. the loss is in the past now, and i think we can all see that the khan of today is not the khan who prescott flattened. i would love a rematch with maidana, though, i reckon it'd be another really entertaining fight.

        Comment

        • D-MiZe
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 25073
          • 1,061
          • 371
          • 75,542

          #34
          Khan has beaten better boxers than Prescott. The only reason they call for a rematch is the fact they question Khan's punch resistance. Since he proved how good it is against Maidana, there is no need for a Prescott rematch.

          Comment

          • arraamis
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2005
            • 8319
            • 583
            • 439
            • 23,488

            #35
            Originally posted by Chunk
            Biggest load of shit i've read on here. It's called boxing mosh, hit and not be hit. Think about your own 'logic' first before you question mine.
            Its called stick & move .... not stick and run. There is a difference between someone running for their life and someone repositioning for angles.

            If you want to see it in action watch Pacman, that is sticking and moving. He's not running away from the opponent, he is changing angles.

            Comment

            • fundicao
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Nov 2011
              • 387
              • 22
              • 0
              • 6,687

              #36
              The will never fight ...prescott have done very good fights but he lost them all...for me this is like saying "hey when the two of us we're over we can make the rematch"

              Comment

              • Fishkie
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 253
                • 14
                • 56
                • 6,903

                #37
                Again with Prescott? What about the guys that are beating him? They deserve the press, not a guy who scored a shocker a 1000 yrs ago and havent won a meaninfull fight since.

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #38
                  Originally posted by arraamis
                  Its called stick & move .... not stick and run. There is a difference between someone running for their life and someone repositioning for angles.

                  If you want to see it in action watch Pacman, that is sticking and moving. He's not running away from the opponent, he is changing angles.
                  Yeah Pacman sticks and moves straight into lead right hands

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP